Tag Archives: rosa clemente

http://slweekly.com/index.cfm?do=article.details&id=2577C32F-14D1-13A2-9FF10BA236D60814

Cynthia McKinney is a former Georgia House of Representatives member. She served six terms as a Democrat, including powerful assignments on the Armed Services and International Relations committees. In 2008, she left the Democratic Party to run for president as the Green Party candidate.

You were originally a Democratic member of the House, but switched party affiliation to the Green Party. What motivated this shift?
The Democratic Party left me by refusing to address rampant voter disenfranchisement in 2000 and 2004 and refusing to stand up to an administration that was lying to the public, which resulted in trillion-dollar deficit for the people and loss of lives in Iraq. I found a home where my values were reflected back to me, with the Green Party.
 
What changes would a McKinney administration bring?
First, we would stop the wars. Then, we would start to undo the mess Wall Street has made with the connivance of the two parties by bringing the four pillars of the Green Party (ecological wisdom, social justice, grassroots democracy and nonviolence) into the policymaking of this country. We would see an end to institutional policies of discrimination and class division, which would strengthen our communities to be sustainable, healthy, and livable.
 
Why should voters support your campaign?
I have worked to bring integrity to our purported democracy by addressing the inequities of the voting process in order to ensure that everyone has the right to vote. I am committed to bringing our troops home from Iraq. Our administration would decrease defense spending and use those dollars for human services, such as education and universal single-payer health care, and improving our planet through programs that will support a healthier environment and provide a new manufacturing base of jobs in the renewable energy sector.
 
What is the hardest part about running a third-party ticket?
The corporate-controlled media says this is a two-party country, despite the fact that the constitution never mentions political parties. Thus I am routinely ignored (thankfully not by your paper) and, though Americans may share my values, they have to spend time searching for information that I exist and am a viable candidate for president. In addition, ballot-access laws vary wildly from state to state, making it extremely prohibitive for parties to run qualified candidates and give voters more choice. Utah is considered one of the “reddest” states in the nation, thus making it seem like there is no choice. It is difficult to persuade citizens to consider voting for Green Party candidates and values when they think their vote doesn’t matter.
 
Would opening the debates create a flood of candidates filing for the presidency?
It might, but considering the quality of what the two biggest parties offer, wouldn’t that be preferable? Opening the debates would certainly make a situation where more diverse people would file and it would make them more representative of the population and constituency.
 
What would ending NAFTA and other trade agreements do for the average person?
For many people it would mean they would have jobs again, jobs producing products our communities need. It would restore environmental and worker protections as well as incentives for local manufacturing and production. This would benefit all of us with higher paying, more stable, and more meaningful employment opportunities. The products produced would not have to be recalled because they contain elements known to be toxic.
 
Ending economic disparities is a proposal. What programs would bring an end to disparities?
That’s like asking for a laundry list! First, let’s stop the golden parachutes for CEOs who can’t run a business, and that means electing people who aren’t beholden to corporations. An end to ridiculous “free trade” agreements. Real support for public education, including helping everyone who wants to go to college. When our urban schools fail, partly because of lead paint in the homes and poor diets, a major lead-removal program and urban gardens may be the things that make the biggest difference. Major tax reforms that don’t punish people for not being wealthy. Making sure every American has a home, a home that uses no fossil fuels and has no toxins in its construction, and a major investment in clean, renewable-energy systems and mass transit that works.
 
You propose reparations for blacks. Would this lift the economic disparity? Where would the funds come for this program?
The fortunes in this country were originally based on ownership of land or on the slave trade, and that original deficit in the owning of land created an economic hole that African-Americans have never been able to climb out of. A lack of democracy has perpetuated that system, in which African-Americans own less, and are subjected to the most financial irregularities that Wall Street perpetuates. There are many things to do to end the disparities in our communities: remove lead paint, improve the diet of all children, improve schools in low-income neighborhoods instead of giving them fewer resources; the list goes on for quite awhile.  Reparations is one of the things that completes the picture. If we stop funding wars and bailouts, we could do amazing things in this country.
 
How does the McKinney campaign differ from Obama and McCain?
My campaign is not lead by corporate lobbyists and spin-doctors. It is based on real people with real solutions for the violence, injustice and ecological collapse we see around us. Since we take no corporate contributions, we do not work for Wall Street—we work only for you!
Some of the policy differences are:

• n The McKinney Campaign wants immediate withdrawal of troops and contractors from Iraq (thereby bringing Utah troops home).
• n The McKinney Campaign wants to cut off all war funding—thereby having more money for human-welfare services such as education, where Utah has the lowest spending per pupil and the highest class sizes in the nation.
• n The McKinney campaign supports a universal single-payer health care system that covers everyone.
• n The McKinney Campaign opposes war with Iran.

 
Do you believe you will win?
What is your definition of "win?" If the Green Party gets 5 percent of the vote, we will qualify for millions of dollars in public funding. This will enable us to promote policies that the other parties aren’t even mentioning, such as single-payer, universal health care. If you want public policy that that reflects your values, then your vote for the Green Party will be a step toward that goal.

This is posted at Gail’s Tails

ten reasons not to vote for obama or macain
…and to vote for Cynthia McKinney

1. Both support the bombing of Pakistan.
2. Neither one is in favor of a compete military withdrawal from Iraq. Ever!
3. Both support a military escalation of the war in Afghanistan.
4. They wholeheartedly buy into the untrue story that Russia started the Georgia conflict.
5. Both are pushing for the Ukraine to join the EU even though only 17% of the people there even slightly want it.
6. They continue to demonize the democracy movements in South America.
7. Both support a declaration of war, through a naval blockade, of Iran.
8. They fail to realize that the cold war is over and will not normalize relations with Cuba.
9. They want to surround Russia with nuclear missles.
10. They support a continuation of the military-industrial complex.

This was found on Feminism ain’t about equality……it’s about reprieve.

Why I Voted for Cynthia McKinney

October 19, 2008 by lisakristine

If you are interested in real change, vote third party. That’s what I ultimately decided for the 2008 election. Now I know many of you are thinking, “A third party vote is a vote thrown away. She’s not going to win any more than Nader is going to win!” I know that, and don’t get me wrong, I almost got carried away with all the commotion from the Obama crowd. I do like Obama and I think he’ll make a good president if he wins. But he doesn’t have my vote and this is why:

While the public and the media has celebrated that we have a viable Black candidate for president, they have failed to give any attention to the other Black candidate, Cynthia McKinney. She was a congresswoman from Georgia and she is the presidential candidate for the Green Party. Apparently, our public isn’t truly looking for change and diversity, or perhaps you would have heard McKinney’s name by now. A woman and a minority? HELLO CNN! Here’s a story for you. But … no. They have left her quite alone in the empty corner reserved for third party candidates. No one has celebrated the diversity she brings to the 2008 race, and no one has cared to look into what she stands for. Once you inform yourself about McKinney, you would no longer look at Obama as the diverse “change” candidate.

Clearly, McKinney will not be elected President. That is not why I am voting for her. Voting for a third party candidate is a political tactic to pressure the two major parties (dems and reps) into addressing issues that remain at the periphery of mainstream public debate. This tactic has historical significance and effectiveness: For instance, third party interests swayed the platform of William J. Bryan (D) in 1896. Bryan changed his platform in order to steal votes from the populist movement (a third party movement). Another example: Charles Evans (R) in 1916, changed the republican platform in order to steal votes away from the Republican-turned-Progressive (third) Party candidate, Theodore Roosevelt. More recently, in 2000 Ralph Nader ran on the platform of breaking corporate control of government, and this directly influenced both Obama and McCain after this to talk about the need for campaign finance reform, shifting their stances to reflect that of the Independent Party.
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

HERE IS AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT THE GREEN PARTY IS ABOUT:
Continue reading →

Rosa Clemente, Green Party Vice Presidential candidate, talks about the Green Party and race.

http://www.rosaclemente.com

Craig Seeman
NY