Tag Archives: Utah

Challenge to our Free Expression Event

Yesterday I posted a description of the Empty Shoes of War event that I helped organize.

The event was continually challenged throughout the day (probably due to the graphic nature of the content) – not by the public, mind you……by the personnel inside the public library attached to the public plaza. I have written a letter of complaint to Salt Lake City. It explains everything that happened throughout the day (with copies sent to the library directors and to the ACLU):

The Desert Green Party of Utah applied for a permit on Tuesday, January 2, 2007 for an event titled “Empty Shoes of War” to be held on Saturday, January 27, 2007 between the hours of 9-5 on the library plaza.  The permit, #FS07-002, was approved by the Salt Lake City Corporation Special Events Department.

The hours of the event were adjusted to 10am to 2pm because of the cold temperatures.  Members of the Desert Green Party of Utah set up the display at 9:30am and tore down at 2:00pm.  The nature of the event was to display children’s shoes and photos of injured, sickened and dead Iraqi children to educate the general public on the effects of war on civilians.  The reaction to us from everyone that stopped was highly positive.

The Desert Green Party of Utah complied with all requirements per the permit, inclusive of item #5, to wit:

“You must position your activity and participants in such a way that pedestrians have safe passage and access to the sidewalks, Library and business entrances on Library Square.  You may not block or attempt to block any entrance or driveway.”

As part of the application process, we completed a diagram, which was approved by your department, outlining where our display would be located.  This diagram is attached.  I have also included photos of the actual display that day to prove that we adhered to the requirements of the permit approved by your department.  At no time was there ever a blockage of the doorway, in fact it was quite the opposite.  There are multiple witnesses who can attest to this. Additionally, at no time did we receive any complaints from the general public.

During the day on January 27, 2007, the Desert Green Party members were continually confronted by library personnel about moving the display.  Below is outlined the sequence of these confrontations, with times being approximate, except the last bulleted item which is exact.

1.        10:00am:  Two library workers came out to ask us to move our display “back” and to make sure we didn’t block the door.  We pointed out that we were complying with the permit we had been issued.  We did move the display back about a foot, more towards the fountain.

2.      11:00am:  Library maintenance employee confronted Desert Green Party members requesting the display be moved 25 feet from the door, quoting that request as “it’s the rule of the library.”   When we questioned him on this, he then stated the following (This is paraphrased and not a direct quote):

“Children walk by here every day.   Some children might be traumatized by this.”  When asked if he then was requesting that we move our display due to the content, he quickly corrected himself by saying “It’s the library rule.”

Upon reviewing our permit, we could not find any regulation to the 25 foot rule, nor could we find anything drawing a line between “library property” and “city property,” except the doors to the library building.   When we asked if the library director could come talk to us, the employee said “he is not here today, it’s the weekend.”   We then asked him to produce the document highlighting the library rule that stated we had to be 25 feet away from the door.  He said he would produce it.

3.        11:30am:  The same library maintenance employee came to the Desert Green Party members with a document in his hand that he showed to us and admittedly stated that the only “rule” referring to being 25 feet away from the door was with regards to smoking.  No such written rule was ever produced to us during the day.  When asked if there had been any complaints, this employee said “none at all.”

He then made it a point to tell us that if we had “any problems.” to make sure to call security.

4.        11:45am:  A library security officer came out to the Desert Green Party display and gave us his phone number and told us that if was had “any trouble,” to be sure to call him.

5.        1:15pm:  It was observed that a library worker came to the doors and remained inside while she surveyed the activity outside.  There were few people outside and there was no one at the doors.

6.        1:30pm:  The same library security officer came to the Desert Green Party display to make sure we were “alright.”

(NOTE:  We found it odd that we were continually being checked up on for our safety because at no time during the event did we ever have any indication of hostility or anger on the part of passersby, in fact, quite the opposite.)

7.        1:45pm (exact time):  Two women workers from the library approached the Desert Green Party Members running the event.  One woman identified herself as the Library Director.  She was very agitated and while communicating to us that she “remained neutral” on our event, we had to move our display to the opposite side of where we were currently located.  We challenged this, again, stating that our permit allowed us to be here.  She proceeded to tell us that the “library property” was from the south edge of the outside elevator (note elevator is located on library plaza and comes up from the parking deck below the library) proceeding westward and that we had to move our display on the south side of that imaginary boundary line (note that this was in contradiction to the first request of moving our display to the opposite side of where we were located which was in front of the elevator, causing confusion in exactly what was being asked of us and what the Library Director was telling us was “the rule”).

When asked if there had been complaints, the Library Director said “yes.”  When asked what the nature of the complaints were she said that our event was “being perceived as a library sponsored event.”  When asked why the library issued a permit to the group sponsoring an event inside the library, which was explicitly anti-war, she responded that the group had reserved the room, and that they were presenting all points of view.  This is not true, and again, represents a judgment based on the content of the event, not the neutrality of the library. We replied that this is not our issue but, rather, an issue between the library and the Special Events Department and that we were complying with all the requirements of the permit we had been issued.

We told the Library Director that we were tearing down our display at 2:00 (15 minutes from the time she approached us).  The Director said “That isn’t good enough – you have to move now.”  We told her we would not to which she responded, “I will move it myself.”  She proceeded to move towards the display with the intent of touching the items, but stopped at our emphatic “NO”.  We then moved the confrontation to the news camera where the rest of the disagreement was recorded, ending with the Director telling us she would be contacting the city and then us with the results of her complaint.

     It is important to note that at the same time as our event, there was an anti-war activity being held inside with a crowd of people in the Urban Room, less than 25 feet from the library doors, crowding around literature tables waiting to go into the auditorium for a panel discussion.  When we brought this to the attention of the library director, she said that they had signed up for the room per the library rules.  Yet just prior to this she had told us that “of course no antiwar event could sign up to use the Urban Room.” There was a crowd of about 50 people blocking the walkway in the Urban room on the inside of the south doors to the library!

It was also observed that the organizers of the inside event, while their event was scheduled for 2:00pm, showed up at 9:30am., placed all of their materials on tables inside the Urban Room and sat there until it was time for their event.  To our knowledge, if they had not signed up to be at that location at that time, they were never challenged on their presence there.

Due to the sequence of events and the nature of the confrontations throughout the day, we feel almost certain that we were being challenged and discriminated against due to the nature of our event.  We were complying with all regulations of Salt Lake City, per the permit that is issued to us and were not making any violations of the permit.

     I would also like to point out that as a participant with tabling organizations at events such as PRIDE, displays and booths have been situated in such a way that there is less than 25 feet space between booths and the doors.

                We therefore request that if a complaint comes from Salt Lake City Library personnel, that our organization, Desert Green Party of Utah, not be penalized since we were within the purview of the Free Speech Permit issued to us for this event.  If there are inconsistencies in policies of the library and Salt Lake City Corporation, we view this as an issue that needs to be addressed between the respective agencies and not be taken as an action of civil disobedience on the part of our organization.

   Thank you for your time in reviewing this communication and we hope that we can continue to obtain free speech permits for our non-violent peaceful assemblies and events.

 Sincerely,

Deanna L. Taylor
Desert Green Party of Utah

cc: 

Nancy Tessman, Director (postal mail)

Salt Lake City Library

 Chip Ward, Assistant Director, wardchip@hotmail.com
Salt Lake City Library

 American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
Representative unknown at this time – faxed to general number

Eileen McCabe, Member
Desert Green Party of Utah

Utah Legislative Bills

Utah LegislativeNews

Deseret News
Education dilemma for illegals:  Some pinning hopes on passage of DREAM Act

Students fear repeal of the in-state tuition perk
Busy interns immersed in business of Capitol
Several legislative bills address illegal immigration
UVSC bill moves to panel in Senate

Demos like new rulesTuition relief on horizon
Pignanelli & Webb: School vouchers are divisive issue (opinion)

Porn bust used to push funding bill

Legislation would allow an appeal on graduation test

Regulation of boxing sought

Fines OK’d for payday lenders

Photo: Hats off to senior

2007 tuition legislation

Partisan races for school boards?

Web drug sales are bill’s target

Is parity funding ahead for charters?
Beer tax may aid disabled kids
Proposals take aim at UEA dominance

Dental hygienist bill sparks contentio
House committee votes to hold video game bil
Senate again approves drug list for Medicaid
Measure adds felony provision in cruelty-to-animals cases
Roads legislation is amended but passes out of Senate panel
House set to OK vouchers?
Ticket quotas targete
New license plates sough
Utah Lake panel may get an O
Utah lawmakers grill Cannon, Matheson during courtesy visit
School chiefs baffled by bill seeking retention vote
A bill detailing school-district splits advances
Voucher backers spreading message
Advocates seek rise in funds for cancer screening
Senate to reconsider Medicaid drug list
Benefits considered for military familie
Crime bill adds penalty if kids are witnesses
Transportation panel approves DUI bill
Huntsman expects to sign ethical standards soon
Energy bills offer incentives
Legislative actions
EnergySolutions bill passes Senate committee
Cannon exchange with legislators becomes heated
House favors bill to cut food tax
Changes sought on abortion law
Anti-gaming bill held to address concerns
Senate panel OKs bill to let trout groups buy stream flows
Utahns add input, comments on health-program funding
Education audit sought as leverage
Waddoups bill would redirect restaurant-tax revenue
House approves Juab County water resolution
Utah Senate approves preferred-drug-list bill, but sponsor criticizes amendment
Legislator posts a draft of voucher bill on blog
School drug bill passes with veto-proof majorit
Senate OKs overhaul of child-support guidelines
House rejects measure to require booster seat
Utah Latino group files complaint on audit of students
Legislative actions
Driving bill stems from loss of niece
Effort to ban unmarked police vehicles fails
School-club bill called unnecessary
Cell phone bill passes committee
Bigelow effort would fund more school nurse
House committee OKs bill on payday lenders
Rural firms may get funds
Drug reform act heads to Senate floor

Drug list for Medicaid clears hurdle
Video-game measure may be tough sell to courts
Contentious child-support measures advance
Legislature may lower age limit of big-game hunter
House Republicans debate 2 tax bills
Legislator’s $4,000 pay goes to 4 local PTAs
House panel approves child-murder measure
Drug-free-zones bill advances in the House
HB106 would help track 2 kinds of Utah firms
Senators OK $9 billion in base budget spending
House OKs bill to ban protests at funerals
Committee backs limits on sales of ephedrine
Audit sought on education costs for undocumented immigrants
Legislators focus on illegal immigrants
Legislative actions
House passes bill outlawing demonstrations at funerals
A $10 million UVSC ‘down payment’
2 tax-cut bills advance to House floor
Bill requiring public hearings on school closures, boundary adjustments advances
Extending health benefits in work accidents backed
Utahns may get help on owed commissions
Bill targets smoking in cars with children
Transit bill could hamper rail funding, UTA says
House Demos attack tuition voucher bill
State retirees may face hurdle in return to work
DUI measure calls for car locking devices
Public-comment rules may receive clarification
WSU-USU engineering partnership proposed
No action taken on Net government notices
Tax foe’s bill calls for a ‘Tax Me More Fund’
Child-support overhaul stalls in Senate
Driver’s license retesting bill voted down
Demo takeover could hurt Utah, Bennett says
Photo: Chilly January day on the Hill

House committee advances $279 million tax cut
Action taken this morning by the Utah Legislature

Pet-cruelty law sought
Senators get a jump on budget
Child support facing overhaul?

Pignanelli & Webb: Basic Capitol Hill jargon for dummies (opinion)
Jay Evensen: School choice prepares kids for the world (opinion)
Utah bills affecting families
East-west traffic flow is hot issue
‘Lost Boys,’ other FLDS teens lobby lawmakers
School-clubs bill aims to keep parents in the loop
Seniors need alternatives (opinion)
Repeal of tuition break for immigrants advances
Religious-expression bill goes to Senate
Mom offers emotional plea for primary seat-belt law
Gold Star license plates OK’d by Senate panel
Graduated licensing bill stalls in committee
2 ‘base budget’ bills await Senate approval
Panel passes CHIP bill after substantial debate
Senate panel approves cap on contributions
Panel beefs up law on assault of law officer
Friday’s activity at the Utah Legislature
Utah schools look flush …

Speaker requesting audit of all Utah school districts
Will wine, galleries mix?
A statewide restriction on tanning for minors?
Bob Bernick Jr.: Can legislators sustain their tax-cutting truce? (opinion)
Utah must rein in spending growth, lawmaker says
Measure would let EnergySolutions move waste on site
Emergency planning bill gets Senate panel’s OK
Mayne’s bill safeguards settlements for disabled
Voucher bill, similar to last year’s, may pass this year
Foster-home 911 issue resurfaces
House OKs Water Week for early May

Salt Lake Tribune

Kindergarten debate:  Does all-day make all-stars? Guv wants more funding for the programs

Guv, GOP at odds on lobbyists:  He may bypass lawmakers to get some ethics reformsJazz tickets too risky a perk


Empty Shoes of War

Yesterday I was part of the organizing team for an exhibit called
Empty Shoes of War. The event was permitted by the city of Salt Lake.

The display was of empty children’s shoes (donated to Crossroads Urban Center afterwards)accompanied by collages of photos of orphaned, injured and dead children to show the effects of war in Iraq. While some of the photos were graphic, the public communicated to us all day that it was a great display and one that people should be seeing. We had great dialogue with parents, military personnel, teachers, teenagers and vets.



Throughout the day we were confronted about moving our display by library personnel (we didnt’ move) which I will post about at a later date. It was definitely an exercise in standing up for freedom of expression.

Coverage of Local Anti-War Events Yesterday

Below are the articles I found on yesterday’s coverage of events in Salt Lake. BYU Television also covered the event, but I can’t find a link to it on their website.

Utahns pack Salt Lake library to condemn war, buildup
The people decide, activists say to Bush: War protesters denounce the president’s plan for more troops in Iraq, call for protests

News of Today’s Anti-War Events

Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson in Washington D.C. during the March on Washington
Rocky cries ‘no more’ to the Iraq war:
SLC mayor joins big-name speakers to stir up crowd

Rocky attacks ‘immoral war’:S.L. mayor, others speak out at huge D.C. protest
One Utah’s sound file of Rocky’s speech
Rocky Rallies In D.C., Reveals Plans For Future
Rocky joins celebs in rallying D.C. anti-war crowd
Mayor Anderson Delivers Anti-War Speech in Nation’s Capitol
Actors, Soldiers, SLC Mayor Demand End To Iraq War

Raise a red flag on EnergySolutions

EnergyPollutions and supporters are up to no good.  This came in from HEAL Utah:

Yesterday, the Utah Senate Natural Resources Committee voted to remove the oversight of all publicly elected officials from nuclear waste expansions at EnergySolutions.  Senate Bill 155 (Waste Amendments), sponsored by Sen. Peterson (R-Nephi), prevents all future Governors, Legislatures, and Tooele County commissioners from ever stopping any expansion at EnergySolutions’ current dumpsite.

 
The staggering implications of the legislature removing itself and all other elected officials from decisions to bring more nuclear waste to Utah are perhaps only overshadowed by the willingness of certain legislators to rewrite state law for one company.
 
A massive public outcry is the only thing that can stop this.  Please join us in opposing Senate Bill 155 at a press conference next Wednesday at the Capitol:
 
What: “Red Flag” Press Conference
When: Wednesday, January 31st, 11:00AM-Noon.
Where: Foyer at east entrance to the West Building, Utah State Capitol.
 
Afterwards, stay at the Capitol to deliver your red flag to your legislator.

Why “red flag?”  Sen. Gene Davis (D-Salt Lake) said yesterday he supported SB 155 because the public can still raise “red flags” through the regulatory process, and regulators can take those concerns to the legislature.  Clearly, Sen. Davis and others would prefer to send their constituents off to state regulators rather than listen to their concerns directly. 
 
But if EnergySolutions can get legislators to rewrite state laws for them and citizens are told to bring their concerns elsewhere, that should raise a red flag for all of us.  Join us on Wednesday to do just that and demand that the approval process for nuclear waste dump expansions maintains oversight from elected officials accountable to the people of Utah.
 
Besides attending the press conference, please also:
1) Contact your state senator and urge him or her to oppose SB 155 when it comes to a full senate vote (to find your state senator’s contact info, visit http://www.le.state.ut.us/maps/amap.html)
2) Write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper.  For our letter to the editor page, visit http://www.healutah.org/get-involved/how-to-write-a-letter-to-the-editor.
3) Stop by our office next Monday or Tuesday at 6:00pm to help make red flags.  (Our office is located at 68 S Main St on the 4th floor).
 
If the Divine Strake hearings have taught us anything, it’s that regulators are often immune to public comment.  It is only through demanding accountability from our elected leaders that we have made any headway in stopping that test. 
 
Please join us on Wednesday to let our legislators know we expect them to hold the interests of Utahns above those of a wealthy nuclear waste dump’s. 
 
On a somewhat brighter note, we know we don’t have to but we want to thank all of you who attended Gov. Huntsman’s Divine Strake hearing last night.  Even if the concern, outrage, pain, and heartfelt emotion expressed in the personal stories and comments last night fall on deaf ears at the federal agencies conducting this test, the evening certainly made the will to fight stronger in the 200 of us who were in attendance.  Check out Channel 2 tonight at 10:00PM for a story on Utah’s Downwinders inspired by last night’s hearing.
 
Thanks for everything you do,
 

John Urgo
HEAL Utah, Outreach Director
68 S. Main St, Suite 400
SLC, UT 84101
(801) 355-5055

Divine Strake Hearing Comments

Excerpts:
Listen to the entire hearing
Written Text:
Eileen McCabe, sister radical cheerleader
Sound files:
Pete Ashdown,2006 U.S. Senate Candidate
Cindy Bur, local activist
Shea Pickelner, sister radical cheerleader
Rupert Steele, Goshute Tribe

**CANCEL** THE DIVINE STRAKE! STOP WEAPONS TESTING ON WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND! END NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION!

Divine Strake Test Hearing

Tonight is the Governor of Utah’s Public Hearing on the Divine Strake Test:

Utah State Capitol, West Building, Room 135 (Main Floor, NW)
450 N. State Street, 5:30 – 8:30 PM

The Divine Strake experiment is proposed by the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) and outlined in their “Draft December 2006 Revised Environmental Assessment, for the Large-Scale, Open-Air Explosive Detonation Divine Strake at the Nevada Test Site.”

Governor Huntsman will make introductory remarks at the Salt Lake City hearing and January 24th and a court reporter will record all public comments at both meetings. The Governor will include a transcript of the hearings in his comment letter to the NNSA/NSO opposing the Divine Strake experiment.

Dianne Nielson, (801) 536-4402
Executive Director, DEQ
Donna Spangler, (801) 536-4484
Public Information Officer, DEQ

Pom Poms Not Bomb Bombs plans to make an appearance as folks arrive for the hearing.

**CANCEL** THE DIVINE STRAKE! STOP WEAPONS TESTING ON WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND! END NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION!

Rocky Goes to Washington and will speak at anti-war rally there

Rocky to ‘highlight’ D.C. anti-war rally
Speech of SLC mayor is advertised as an example of how unpopular Bush policies are – even in Utah
By Heather May
The Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated: 01/19/2007 12:37:43 AM MST


Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson speaks at an anti-war… (Ryan Galbraith Tribune file photo )

He has made national news – twice – for protesting President Bush in Salt Lake City. Now, Rocky Anderson will have a national stage to castigate the commander in chief.
Salt Lake City’s mayor will speak at an anti-war rally on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 27, sharing the microphone with the Rev. Jesse Jackson, presidential hopeful Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and the father of a military officer who refuses to deploy to Iraq.
The demonstration – expected to draw hundreds of thousands in the largest anti-war protest since November’s elections – is being organized by the New York-based United for Peace and Justice in response to Bush’s plan to send 21,500 more U.S. troops to Iraq.
The rally will call on Congress to “end Bush’s war and bring the troops home,” according to organizers.
Continue reading