Tag Archives: government corruption

Income Tax: Where It Is Actually Spent–WAR

Now that Income Tax Season is over, I thought I’d post the War Resisters League Pie Chart of how our taxes are really spent:

Where Your Income Tax Money Really Goes FY 2008

Total Outlays (Federal Funds): $2,387 billion
MILITARY: 51% and $1,228 billion
NON-MILITARY: 49% and $1,159 billion

FY2008 federal piechart

HOW THESE FIGURES WERE DETERMINED

Current military” includes Dept. of Defense ($585 billion), the military portion from other departments ($122 billion), and an unbudgetted estimate of supplemental appropriations ($20 billion). “Past military” represents veterans’ benefits plus 80% of the interest on the debt.*

The Government Deception

The pie chart below is the government view of the budget. This is a distortion of how our income tax dollars are spent because it includes Trust Funds (e.g., Social Security), and the expenses of past military spending are not distinguished from nonmilitary spending. For a more accurate representation of how your Federal income tax dollar is really spent, see the large chart (top).

the government's deceptive pie chart

Source:Washington Post , Feb. 6, 2007,
from Office of Management and Budget

These figures are from an analysis of detailed tables in the “Analytical Perspectives” book of the Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2008. The figures are federal funds, which do not include trust funds — such as Social Security — that are raised and spent separately from income taxes. What you pay (or don’t pay) by April 17, 2007, goes to the federal funds portion of the budget. The government practice of combining trust and federal funds began during the Vietnam War, thus making the human needs portion of the budget seem larger and the military portion smaller.

*Analysts differ on how much of the debt stems from the military; other groups estimate 50% to 60%. We use 80% because we believe if there had been no military spending most (if not all) of the national debt would have been eliminated. For further explanation, please see box at bottom of page.

MORE WAR MONEY

Cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars
(billions of dollars)

spending on war

U.S. Gov’t Accounting Office report, “Global War on Terrorism,” 7/18/06, www.gao.gov/new.items/d06885t.pdf (thru 2006); 2007 & 2008 numbers from current U.S. Budget; *Our FY2008 projected supplemental funding is based on estimates in the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments report by Steven Kosiak, 2/6/07, www.csbaonline.org, and because of the Administration’s past underprojections

Current Military
$727 billion:

• Military Personnel $136 billion
• Operation & Maint. $249 billion
• Procurement $111 billion
• Research & Dev. $70 billion
• Construction $10 billion
• Family Housing $4 billion
• DoD misc. $6 billion
• Retired Pay $52 billion
• DoE nuclear weapons $17 billion
• NASA (50%) $9 billion
• International Security $10 billion
• Homeland Secur. (military) $31 billion
• Exec. Office of President $1 billion
• other military (non-DoD) $1 billion
• plus … anticipated supplemental war spending requests of $20 billion in addition to $141 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan wars already incorporated into figures above

Past Military,
$461 billion:

• Veterans’ Benefits $85 billion
• Interest on national debt $376 billion (80% est. to be created by military spending)

Human Resources
$748 billion:

• Health/Human Services
• Soc. Sec. Administration
• Education Dept.
• Food/Nutrition programs
• Housing & Urban Dev.
• Labor Dept.
• other human resources.

General Government
$295 billion:

• Interest on debt (20%)
• Treasury • Government personnel • Justice Dept.
• State Dept.
• Homeland Security (17%)
• International Affairs
• NASA (50%)
• Judicial
• Legislative
• other general govt.

Physical Resources
$116 billion
:
• Agriculture
• Interior
• Transportation
• Homeland Security (17%)
• HUD
• Commerce
• Energy (non-military)
• Environmental Protection
• Nat. Science Fdtn.
• Army Corps Engineers
• Fed. Comm. Commission
• other physical resources

Ya Better Watch Out – Cheney is coming to town

Things are really heating up here in Utah over Dick Cheney’s visit to Utah on April 26 when he will speak at Commencement ceremonies that day.
Today’s Deseret News has announced an “alternative commencement” event, that I received an email about from a BYU student yesterday.

The alternative commencement group hopes to draw 1,000 to 2,000.
“A lot of people from different groups in Salt Lake have said they’re interested in coming down,”
[Ashley]Sanders[event organizer] said. “They’ve already chartered buses.”

Students at BYU who are unhappy with Cheney’s upcoming visit have just about secured Ralph Nader to be the featured speaker at that event:

I am part of a group of students and community members who oppose Dick Cheney coming to speak at BYU’s commencement. We are, among other things, working to organize an alternative commencement and have been in negotiations with Ralph Nader to come and speak at this alternative commencement.

The group is in the process of raising the $15,000 to secure Nader for this event.

“Operation Bite”

I have been hearing frequently more recently about the U.S.’s “Operation Bite” against Iran, scheduled for TODAY.  I have been participating in actions over the last week and a half to make noise about this.  Here is a photo of my friends holding a banner we made that made its debut yesterday, first in front of Channel 2 in Salt Lake City, where for an instant you could see the banner in the window behind the anchors on the 5pm news (they quickly shot away from that and moved the anchors), and then at the sidewalk vigil:


The issue is Iran’s development of nuclear weapons and the recent expediency in which they are developing them.  I have been scouring the news this morning in the limited time I have to see any indication of military aggression on the part of the U.S. against Iran and so far haven’t seen anything about the bombing campaign I had been reading about.

I keep reading and re-reading about the nuclear weapons issue with Iran and how the U.N. Security Council is discussion imposing stricter sanctions against Iran for developing nuclear weapons.

But the U.S. is planning to use nuclear weapons on Iran because of their development of nuclear weapons.  Why is that o.k.?  It is no secret that the U.S. is developing tests for the development of new nuclear weapons and new replacement warheads itself.  Why is that o.k.?  Why isn’t the U.N. Security Council making noise about that?  It doesn’t make sense.

Here are some news items collected over the last week:


Opinion/Commentary

Who will bite first, the U.S. or Iran?

Crossfire War – Pentagon Operation Bite – Iran’s Nuclear Program

News

Iranian president announces release of British naval personnel
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/04/africa/web0404-iran2.php

ABC News Exclusive: The Secret War Against Iran
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/04/abc_news_exclus.html

Britain Adopts Conciliatory Tone with Iran
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/world/middleeast/01iran.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Power Struggle in Iran Over Hostages
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1596694.ece

Gulf Allies Reject Role in any Attack on Iran
http://www.yorkdispatch.com/nationworld/ci_5548268

Iran: Decision to withhold information due to fear of U.S., Israeli attack
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/844232.html  

US Ready to Strike Iran on Good Friday
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879220977&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Any Casus Belli Will Do
http://www.antiwar.com/prather/?articleid=10749

U.S. Ready to Strike Iran in Early April
http://en.rian.ru/world/20070330/62861432.html

Iranian Official: Sailors May be Tried
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070331/D8O76O400.html

Experts: US operation in Iran supposes usage of nuclear weapons
http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=5248

Fate of Five Detained Iranians Unknown
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/03/30/192/

Iran Changed Coordinates of British Boats Say s British Ambassador
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Iran_Changed_Coordinates_Of_British_Boats_Says_British_Ambassador_999.html

Easter Surprise: Attack on Iran , New 9/11… or Worse
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/03/28/150/

USS Nimitz Scheduled to Depart for Persian Gulf
http://www.10news.com/news/11422067/detail.html

Russian Intelligence Sees U.S. Military Buildup on Iran Border
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070327/62697703.html

Iraqi Gen: Brits Entered Iranian Waters
http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID=%7B651827DC-B0C5-4F39-9C20-7060760139CF%7D)&language=EN

Carrier Stennis Joins Eisenhower for Exercises in Persian Gulf
http://content.hamptonroads.com/story.cfm?story=121837&ran=241052

Iran: El-Baradei Says Attack on Country Would be Catastrophic
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/01/20E65B32-383F-4778-A13D-1D438C4E2F34.html

 
For detailed analysis:

What do British sailors, fake water boundaries, a botched US raid in Iraq and a UK political scandal have in common? By Heather Wokusch
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/page.php?a=32938

Beyond Munich: The UN Security Council Helps Disarm a Prospective Further Victim of U.S. Aggression By Edward S. Herman and David Peterson
http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=5248

The War on Iran
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20070401&articleId=5247

Iran: Washington’s Next Nuclear Target? By John Hallam
http://www.greenleft.org.au/2007/705/36618

War Without Win: A White Paper on Iran by William John Cox
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_william__070320_war_without_win_3a__a_.htm

The Redirection by Seymour M. Hersh
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/03/05/070305fa_fact_hersh%3F%25E2%2580%259D

Heads Up on Anti-Iran Propaganda by George Cheney
http://www.catalystmagazine.net/shorts–occasionals/politics-shorts/heads-up-on-anti-iran-propaganda.html

Regime Change is the Reason, Disarmament the Excuse (interview with former weapons inspector Scott Ritter)
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/horton.php?articleid=10595

What’s it Like Waiting Around to be Bombed?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_russ_wel_070328_what_s_it_like_waiti.htm

Keeping All Options on the Table: A Roadmap to Negotiation or War?
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4043

The View From Tehran
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/02/21/letter_from_iran/



 

 

Coverage of BYU Protests Yesterday

Here is coverage of protests by BYU students yesterday regarding Dick Cheney’s visit as speaker for the Aprl 26 Commencement exercises:

Y. rally quite tame: Demos object to Cheney speech; other students protest the protest

By Tad Walch
Deseret Morning News

      PROVO — The only thing burned Wednesday at a midday campus protest at Brigham Young University was the students’ skin.

Students stage a sit-in Wednesday to protest Vice President Dick Cheney being the commencement speaker at BYU. (Stuart Johnson, Deseret Morning News)

Stuart Johnson, Deseret Morning News
Students stage a sit-in Wednesday to protest Vice President Dick Cheney being the commencement speaker at BYU.

      Student Democrats at the private, religious school left the burning-in-effigy of oppressive leaders to Cal-Berkeley and other public universities.
      Still, they considered the relatively tame sit-in a success because more than 300 students, faculty and staff demonstrated their concern about the choice of Vice President Dick Cheney as BYU’s commencement speaker on April 26.
      There were a couple of highlights. One woman wore a paper sack over her head. Another poured water over a second hooded student’s face to symbolize torture tactics supported by Cheney.
      “This is much larger than anyone expected,” said Byron Daynes, a political science professor who spent last year at the University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service. “As a William J. Clinton Fellow, I’m delighted.”
      So was German professor Rob McFarland, who like many of an estimated 50 faculty who joined the demonstration, hoped the protesters would behave themselves so the administration would OK future rallies at a school where they are scarce.
      “It’s very kind of BYU to provide this kind of venue where without vandalism and slander we can share ideas,” said McFarland, who earned a degree at Berkeley.
      The group did not call for BYU to pull Cheney’s invitation, although some demonstrators would like to see that happen.
      “I object to his speaking at commencement,” neuroscience major Heather Marsh said. “Generally commencement is for role models. I don’t think he is someone we should emulate. By protesting, we’re sending a message we don’t like the current trend, and that gives the government a chance to respond. That’s how a democracy works.”
      Most objected to the vice president’s policy on torture and what they said was his war profiteering through Halliburton. They also wanted to make it clear that BYU is not exclusively conservative.
The White House offered Cheney as a commencement speaker to BYU this spring because President Bush couldn’t accept the university’s invitation last year. The First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints then extended the invitation to Cheney in their roles as the leaders of BYU’s board of trustees.
      “The church is neutral but says to be politically active,” McFarland said. “They invited a political speaker, and I think it was a good idea for BYU. They’ve handled it well by making it a catalyst for discussions.”
      The dialogue will continue Monday with a panel discussion sponsored by BYU’s Kennedy Center for International Studies. Four panelists will discuss “Vice President Cheney and the Global War on Terror” in the Varsity Theater at 2 p.m.
      Wednesday’s sit-in was organized by Diane Bailey, president of the BYU College Democrats student club. Bailey obtained permission for the public forum from the dean of Student Life, Vern Heperi, and she kept a tight rein on her charges, telling them to sit inside the orange-tape circle and talk quietly.
      Bailey also asked Heperi for help policing the event.
      “I told the dean I wanted help to make sure causes against our church did not hijack our event,” she said.
      That led to a couple of scenes where administrators pointed out questionable signs to Bailey. She asked four protesters to put away their signs.
      One of them, BYU graduate Tom Doggett, created a placard with pictures of four men — Cheney, LDS Church President Gordon B. Hinckley, deceased former LDS President Spencer W. Kimball and Elder Russell M. Nelson of the church’s Quorum of the Twelve. Church members revere President Hinckley as a prophet and consider Elder Nelson one of 12 living apostles.

Matt Blood, right, holds a sign in favor of Vice President Dick Cheney. BYU's GOP club held a rally in response to Democrats'. (Stuart Johnson, Deseret Morning News)

Stuart Johnson, Deseret Morning News
Matt Blood, right, holds a sign in favor of Vice President Dick Cheney. BYU’s GOP club held a rally in response to Democrats’.

      The sign mimicked the “Sesame Street” song, “One of these things is not like the other. One of these things just doesn’t belong.”
      “I love the prophet and apostles,” said Doggett, who complied with Bailey’s request by folding the sign four ways and then refused to show it to photographers. “I’d rather have them come speak at commencement.”
      While the message didn’t attack the church, some might take it that way, Bailey said.
      “If you put up pictures of the prophet or First Presidency at a protest like this, the automatic assumption for some is that it’s an attack,” Bailey said. Bailey has applied for permission to conduct another demonstration on the day Cheney speaks.
      Several Democrats expressed frustration with the College Republicans student club because it held a simultaneous “pro-BYU” party about 100 yards away. Most of that smaller group’s signs proclaimed the GOP club supported BYU and the church’s First Presidency.
      “The implication is we don’t (support BYU),” complained German professor Alan Keele. “That’s a Karl Rove tactic — to take our message and twist it into something it’s not.”
      While far fewer people stood inside the blue-tape circle at the Republican rally, club president David Lassen said the group gave away 600 cookies to passing students and about 400 BYU-blue armbands signifying support for Cheney.
      The club also gathered thank-you notes for Cheney that Lassen hopes to deliver to the vice president.
      The lack of sustained turnout was no surprise to Adam Stoddard, a political science major from Bountiful. “This campus is conservative but apolitical, not motivated to come out and hold a sign,” he said. The Democrats handed out BYU-white armbands. At the height of the sit-in, the club presidency counted 270 protesters. Several more came and went as the two-hour rally continued, putting total participation over the 300 mark.
      The group ended the sit-in with a spontaneous, hearty rendition of the national anthem.


E-mail: twalch@desnews.com

BYU protests

ALAN CHOATE AND NATHAN JOHNSON – Daily Herald   

Brigham Young University students had three camps to choose from Wednesday in the debate over Vice President Dick Cheney’s scheduled graduation speech later this month.

THEY COULD HAVE JOINED the BYU College Democrats next to the Joseph F. Smith Building to criticize the decision to invite Cheney.

They could have gone one quad over to where the College Republicans were urging people to respect the school’s choices and honor the vice president.

Or, they could have joined the thousands of students who simply walked by one or both demonstrations as they went about their day.

In all, several hundred students expressed an opinion one way or another, and the discussion is going to continue: BYU Democrats President Diane Bailey said there will be another demonstration on April 26, the day Cheney’s speech takes place.

“We’re here to promote political dialogue,” she said. “We are so pleased with how many people came out, with how mature and responsible the dialogue was and how we focused on the policies and not on ad hominem attacks.”

For the most part, the protest was a quiet, seated affair, with Cheney critics holding up signs pointing to problems with the Bush administration’s policies and decisions.

The College Democrats passed out fliers listing reasons why Cheney isn’t a good choice as a commencement speaker.

The grievances included complaints that “Cheney’s controversial actions do not represent a model our students should follow,” criticisms of the Iraq war (such as the war being preemptive and the “misleading use of weak intelligence to elicit fear”), and ties to Halliburton and no-bid wartime contracts awarded to that firm. Cheney is Halliburton’s former CEO.

In the Marigold Quad, meanwhile, the BYU College Republicans organized a counter-demonstration meant to show support for the school and the vice president’s visit.

Students there handed out blue armbands, circulated a letter thanking Cheney for agreeing to speak and offered cookies, brownies and lemonade. People came and went, with between 50 and 75 supporters gathered at any given time.

It was much more informal than the anti-Cheney protest, more like a backyard barbecue than a demonstration — albeit a barbecue where a number of the attendees were journalists with cameras and microphones.

Supporters stayed away from political and policy statements, emphasizing instead Cheney’s long public service record and the distinction of having a vice president — any vice president — come to the school.

“We’re not just supporting Dick Cheney,” said student Amanda Malaman, who was handing out armbands. “We’re supporting the decision BYU has made.”

“We wanted to focus on showing respect for the office,” said David Lassen, chairman of the BYU College Republicans.

Lassen said he knew that viewpoint needed to be expressed when news of the anti-Cheney protests hit national news outlets.

“We decided that we definitely needed to have something to show what the majority of BYU students believe,” he said. “We wanted to show that BYU for the most part is still a group of conservative people who, though we have a healthy diversity, support the vice president coming.”

At one point, several pro-Cheney students decided to march with their signs to the anti-Cheney rally. They stopped and came back, though, after Lassen and others warned them that provoking a confrontation could get the pro-Cheney rally shut down.

BYU spokeswoman Carri Jenkins said that, overall, the protest was handled very well. Jenkins credited student organizers for handling any problems.

This story appeared in The Daily Herald on page A1.

Students Stomp BYU Campus Regarding Cheney Visit

Yes Or No? BYU Students Sound Off On Cheney Visit

By Doug Ware – KUTV.com

(KUTV) PROVO – Is it appropriate for Vice President Dick Cheney to deliver the graduation speech at BYU later this month — given his involvement in world politics and the controversial war in Iraq? Hundreds of students voiced their opinions on Wednesday, during two separate protests which were fully approved by school administrators.

Hundreds of Republican and Democratic students from on-campus clubs began dueling protests at 11:00 a.m. Those in favor of the vice president’s visit gathered at the Marigold Quad.

“We are just showing our support for BYU,” said Cali Nicoll, who supports Cheney’s visit. “We’re just really excited that Vice President Cheney is taking the time to come and speak to us at graduation.”

“Someone with that much experience… I don’t care what side of the aisle he sits on. Everyone can learn from him,” said Matt Waldrip, of the BYU College Republicans.

“I respect the institution, though I don’t respect his policies,” said Bob Rees, who says he is excited for the vice president’s appearance.

Across campus, students who oppose Cheney’s scheduled commencement speech, protested at the Joseph Smith Building Quad. Both sides were color-coded. Supporters wore blue and those opposed wore white.

Some students opposed to the visit held signs that read, “America, one nation under surveillance” and “Faithful mormons against Cheney.”

“Dick Cheney doesn’t speak for me,” said one protester. “We don’t think Dick Cheney is a very good speaker to represent the graduating class because he stands for war and lies, corruption. BYU is about truth and honor and peace.”

“We don’t support what he has done in his position,” said another demonstrator.

“[BYU has] set a precedent of inviting church leaders to speak at commencement because that’s what this university is about,” said one woman who opposes the vice president’s scheduled speech. “And I feel that having a politically-charged figure, despite his office, is inappropriate.”

Some students who oppose Cheney’s visit believe that if the university invites him to speak, it should be in the form of a discussion forum rather than a commencement speech.

Last week, BYU administrators approved students’ request to stage protests on-campus regarding the vice president’s upcoming visit. However, both sides must follow strict protesting guidelines laid out by the university.

Wednesday’s protests were peaceful and campus police were not needed to control the crowd.

Vice President Cheney is scheduled to speak at BYU’s graduation ceremony on April 26, 2007.

MORE:
 Slideshow: Protests at BYU
See Also: BYU gets Vice Pres. Cheney to speak at graduation
See Also: BYU says ‘OK’ to anti-Cheney protest
See Also: Some BYU students want Cheney’s speech canceled

BYU Campus Protests Dick Cheney Speech


By DEBBIE HUMMEL
Associated Press Writer

PROVO, Utah — Some students and faculty on one of the nation’s most conservative campuses want Brigham Young University to withdraw an invitation for Vice President Dick Cheney to speak at commencement later this month.

Critics at the school question whether Cheney sets a good example for graduates, citing his promotion of faulty intelligence before the Iraq war and his role in the CIA leak scandal.

The private university, which is owned by the Mormon church, has “a heavy emphasis on personal honesty and integrity in all we do,” said Warner Woodworth, a professor at BYU’s business school.

“Cheney just doesn’t measure up,” he said.

Woodworth is helping organize an online petition asking that the school rescind its invitation to the vice president. In its first week, the petition collected more than 2,300 signatures, mostly from people describing themselves as students, alumni or members of the church.

The display of dissent is rare for a university that has been voted the nation’s most “stone-cold sober” school nine years in a row in the annual Princeton Review of party schools.

Students at BYU adhere to a strict honor code that forbids everything from drinking coffee to wearing shorts or short skirts. The school’s 30,000 students seldom even stray from campus sidewalks, leaving its lawns pristine.

“Cougars don’t cut corners,” is how one saying describes students, most of whom belong to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

But student Diane Bailey, who is leading a protest Wednesday against Cheney’s visit, said students are not “robotic conservatives.”

Bailey and others are upset by Cheney’s role in promoting faulty intelligence that led the U.S. into the Iraq war. They also cite his proximity to the CIA leak scandal in which his chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice.

Cheney’s BYU speech is the first of two commencement addresses he is scheduled to give this spring. The other will be May 26 at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.

Both are institutions where Cheney could have expected to receive a warm reception, Woodworth said.

Utah has consistently supported the administration, delivering President Bush his largest margin of victory in any state in 2000 and 2004. In Utah County, home to BYU, about 85 percent of voters chose the Bush-Cheney ticket in 2004.

Richard Davis, a political-science professor and adviser for the college Democrats, said the uproar over Cheney’s visit is evidence of a rift within the school and church that belies the faith’s larger claim of being politically neutral.

“He should be invited to come. He should speak. But let’s not send the signal that we’re abandoning our political neutrality,” Davis said. “There is no political gospel in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”

The church has a policy of political neutrality and issues an annual statement declaring that both major political parties include ideals that Mormons could embrace.

“It’s one thing to invite some milquetoast Republican. But Dick Cheney?” Davis said. The protest reflects lack of support for Cheney, as well as “the larger issue of diversity and more liberal people within the BYU community and within the LDS church.”

Historically dissent has not been well received at the school. Last year, a BYU professor wrote a newspaper opinion piece opposing the church’s call for a constitutional ban on gay marriage. In response, the school announced it would not renew Jeffrey Nielsen’s contract.

Cheney’s office said his commencement speech would not have a political theme.

The school approved a permit for the college Democrats’ Wednesday protest and is working on finding a protest site for the day of Cheney’s speech.

“We recognize that members of our campus community are entitled to their opinions,” said university spokeswoman Carri Jenkins. “Political neutrality does not mean there cannot be any political discussion.”

Are these really “protests”?

Today’s Deseret News has an article (below) on today’s “protests” at BYU over the Dick Cheney visit their in late April for commencement exercises.  It’s interesting to see what restrictions are being put in place – by both University officials and the organizations themselves who are organizing the protests:

Y. campus protests to be rather decorous

By Tad Walch
Deseret Morning News

      PROVO — Students in the Republican and Democrat clubs at Brigham Young University will stage dueling campus protests today at 11 a.m. to air their opinions about the upcoming visit of Vice President Dick Cheney.

Image (Deseret Morning News Graphic)

Deseret Morning News Graphic

      The College Democrats club will demonstrate in the Joseph F. Smith Building Quad, which is the area between the front of the building and the Harold B. Lee Library.
      The College Republicans will counter with a rally in the Marigold Quad between the W.W. Clyde Building and the Thomas L. Martin Building, commonly known as the MARB.
      Both protests will last two hours, but “protest” might be too strong a word.
      Leaders on both sides plan to follow strict guidelines laid out by the BYU administration when it approved the Democrats’ rally under the university’s policy regarding public forums.
      First, only students, faculty and staff are allowed to join the demonstrations. BYU policy does not allow off-campus groups to use the campus as a public forum.
      BYU administrators asked protesters not to attack them, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — which owns BYU — or the church’s First Presidency.
      Demonstrators are not to yell, shout, chant or carry signs that include personal attacks.
      “They expect us to self-police it,” said Spencer Dorsey, secretary of the College Democrats club. “They didn’t give a specific consequence if we didn’t follow the rules.”
      The Democrats are making extra signs to replace those people bring that might be too edgy.
      “We’re trying to provide a platform for dialogue,” Dorsey said, “so we’re not going to do a ton of censoring, but if someone is obviously not following the rules, we’ll ask them to stop.”
      The Republicans, well, they agree.
“This is not a gang war but a counter-rally and pro-BYU party,” the student Republican club said in an e-mail sent to state Republican leaders and other supporters on Tuesday. “We don’t want to have any problems or conflicts.”
      That said, the e-mail took a typical political dig at the other side: “Although, if the Democrats got upset at us and lost their tempers, it might make great news. Remember Howard Dean?”
      The College Democrats obtained permission from BYU for their protest last week, while the Republicans received the OK Tuesday.
      Democrat Dorsey said the club’s goal is not to encourage BYU to retract the invitation to Cheney issued by the three-man First Presidency in their roles as chairman and vice chairmen of the board of trustees, even though several professors have made it clear they hope to change the minds of administrators.
      “We realize he’s been invited and we support the First Presidency and the board of trustees in their decision,” Dorsey said. “We’re trying to make it clear this school isn’t comprised entirely of Cheney supporters.”
      That message flashed around the country today as an Associated Press story was published in newspapers and TV Web sites from Minnesota to Texas and Massachusetts to Oregon, not to mention France, the United Kingdom and Canada.
      Blogs responded with exaggerated headlines like the one at Wonkette.com, a D.C. gossip/satire site: “Mormons to Cheney: Even We Hate You Now.”
      The Wall Street Journal’s political blog “Washington Wire” said the fact students at one of the most conservative universities in America don’t want Cheney on campus “takes Veep bashing to a new level.”
      All the attention, including an interview request from Newsweek, boosted enthusiasm among the College Democrats.
      “We’re doing really well,” Dorsey said. “We’ve gotten a lot of positive response. Our main goal is raise awareness and people are engaging in dialogue.”
      The dialogue also includes dueling petition drives. The College Democrats were nearing their goal Tuesday of collecting 3,000 names by the time Cheney speaks at BYU’s commencement exercises on April 26.
      The College Republicans upped the ante Tuesday by calling for supporters to collect 10,000 names.
      And today, they’ll be in dueling colors, Republicans in BYU blue and Democrats in BYU white.


E-mail: twalch@desnews.com

 

Funny highway sign

 

PopDarts.com is your one stop myspace resource

Easter Surprise Attack on Iran?

There have been articles and posts in various sources that indicate a  U.S. Military engagement against Iran could happen soon.

More Protests on the Horizon – re: Cheney @ BYU

Cheney Speech at BYU Causes Outcry

Cheney Speech at BYU Causes Outcry

by Nathan Johnson

At BYU — in the heart of what has been called the reddest county in the nation — the mere possibility of Vice President Dick Cheney coming to campus is getting some blue blood boiling.

Cheney is scheduled to be Brigham Young University’s keynote speaker at this year’s graduation ceremonies. While it is a day of celebration for many, some BYU administrators and faculty, alongside parents and students, are expressing displeasure with the VP’s visit.0327 02 1 2 3

Despite the opposition, BYU spokeswoman Carri Jenkins said that there are currently no plans to eliminate Cheney as a part of the graduation ceremonies.

BYU Marriott School professor Warner Woodworth said that he has received e-mails from all over the world expressing dismay over Cheney’s visit.

Woodworth said that some of those e-mails came from parents and LDS stake presidents, particularly in Latin America, expressing anger that Cheney — whom they called a “warmonger” — will be representing their children and their church.

Woodworth said that administrators, faculty and even some students and parents are refusing to attend graduation ceremonies if Cheney is speaking. Pickets and other forms of protest are also being planned, he said.

Nephi Henry, a BYU student who will be graduating next month, is working with other students in organizing opposition to Cheney’s visit.

 

Henry said his group felt that it was not appropriate for someone of such an “inflammatory” nature to be at BYU. Henry criticized the move to have Cheney because the vice president does not meet the university’s policy on speakers having “a good public reputation and a moral private life.” Additionally, he said the invitation violated BYU’s policy of political neutrality.

“It certainly looks like the church is endorsing someone of a highly patrician political nature,” he said.

Woodworth also expressed concern over Cheney’s fitness to speak to graduates at commencement ceremonies. He said that Cheney’s moral values were not in line with what BYU represents.

“Cheney’s coming here is a contradiction of what we’re trying to do,” he said. “We represent an institution of peace, he represents an institution of war … an institution of deception and outright lies.” he said.

Despite the harsh criticism that Cheney’s invitation has generated, some students and faculty members don’t feel that sit-outs and pickets are appropriate.

BYU law school alumna turned Ph.D. student Betsy Fowler took a more cautious approach to the debate.

“A university is a forum for ideas. While members of the university community have the right to make a statement by not attending, personally I think it is too bad that professors would elect not to support their students whose work and dedication this commencement is intended to celebrate,” she said.

BYU professor of Spanish and Portuguese Ted Lyon is among those who are very displeased at the scheduling of the vice president. While Lyon is not planning to sit out, he does believe that if a political message is going to be issued, then it is necessary to issue a political message on the other side. “I’m suggesting that we invite Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama,” he said.

Lyon said that he has been included in e-mails involving more than 200 students about the vice president’s visit. Lyon said the messages had a tone and tenor of “we want our graduation to have a spiritual tone, not a political tone.”

Henry said that he is leaning toward a boycott of his own graduation if Cheney speaks.

Copyright © 2007 Daily Herald and Lee Enterprises

34 Comments so far

MISS: National Organization of Women endorses Hillary Clinton

Boo, Hiss……..


Women’s group plans to endorse Clinton


NEW YORK (AP) — The political arm of NOW, the National Organization for Women, will endorse Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential bid on Wednesday, according to Democratic officials familiar with the plan.

AP Photo
AP Photo/Charles Dharapak

AP_Tacoda_AMS_DDC_addPair(“SECTION”, “POLITICS”)

AP_Tacoda_AMS_DDC(“http://te.ap.org/tte/blank.gif”, “1.0”)

Clinton will join NOW president Kim Gandy to accept the endorsement, which will take place at Washington’s Sewell-Belmont House, the historic home of the National Women’s Party.

 

“The NOW PAC is excited to close out Women’s History Month with news that’s sure to energize women’s rights supporters across the country,” Gandy said in an e-mail statement.

Clinton, a New York senator, has made a deliberate pitch to women voters since launching her White House bid in January. Earlier this month, her campaign unveiled “Women for Hillary,” an effort to recruit women voters to talk up Clinton’s candidacy to other women. A separate, Web-based component targeting younger women, http://www.icanbepresident.com , is another part of the outreach effort.

Clinton advisers point to 2004, when about 9 million more women than men voted in the general election.

Founded in 1966 by activist Betty Friedan, NOW is one of the oldest and best-known feminist advocacy groups in the country.

NEW YORK (AP) – Democrat Barack Obama has picked up the endorsement of Sheila C. Johnson, the ex-wife of media pioneer Robert Johnson who is backing rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential bid.

“Barack Obama’s campaign of change brings hope to America,” Sheila Johnson said in a statement Tuesday, praising, among other things, the Illinois senator’s opposition to the Iraq war. She also announced she will co-host a luncheon fundraiser for Obama in Washington April 19.

Robert and Sheila Johnson co-founded Black Entertainment Television in 1980 and sold it to Viacom for $3 billion in 2000, making them among the few black billionaires in the United States. The couple divorced in 2002.

Sheila Johnson now runs Salamander Hospitality, a resort and retail chain, and is president of the Washington Mystics basketball team.

Her spokeswoman, Martine Charles, said Johnson has supported both Hillary Clinton and former President Clinton in the past but shifted her allegiance to Obama after meeting with him to discuss issues facing the next president.

“She was really taken with him and thinks he has a fresh perspective on how to bring change to the country,” Charles said.

Asked whether her former husband’s decision to back Clinton had any bearing on Sheila Johnson’s decision, Charles demurred.

“She’s a woman who thinks for herself,” Charles said.

WASHINGTON (AP) – Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani is running ads on conservative talk radio shows in a direct appeal to the Republican voters who could determine the fate of his presidential campaign.

The 30-second spots are airing during Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity shows, popular broadcasts with the conservative base of the GOP. The campaign would not reveal the cost of the ad campaign but said the ads were running nationwide.

Giuliani is leading the Republican field in national polls of Republicans. But he is still viewed with apprehension by social conservatives over his past support for abortion rights, domestic partnership benefits for gay couples and gun-control measures.

The radio ad avoids those subjects.

“My campaign is about leadership and optimism,” he says in the ad. “We need strong leadership to stay on offense in the war against terrorists. We need supply side policies and reduced government spending – fiscal discipline – to keep the economy growing.”

The ad directs listeners to his new Web site, JoinRudy2008.com.

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) – One of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s top supporters says if the Democrat wins the White House, he wants to be part of her team negotiating peace in the Middle East.

Bill Shaheen, a second-generation Lebanese American, last week joined Clinton as co-chairman of her national and state campaigns. He told The Associated Press on Tuesday that reports that he withheld his endorsement until he was promised an ambassadorship were wrong.

“Did she promise (an ambassadorship)? No,” Shaheen said. “That’s not how I work. I don’t think Senator Clinton is thinking that far down the road and I would be disappointed if she was.”

Shaheen met with bloggers after a news conference announcing his endorsement last week. One blog, GreenMountainPolitics1, quoted Shaheen as saying Clinton promised to make him her Middle East envoy.

“The only thing I made Hillary promise in return for helping on her campaign is that she will send me over to the Middle East to help her work for peace in the region,” blogger Chris Stewart quoted Shaheen as saying.

In an interview Tuesday, Stewart said Shaheen never used the word “ambassador.”

The blog BlueHampshire quoted Shaheen as saying: “I said if I do all this for you, I only want one thing: I want to be on that team that brings peace to the Middle East. I believe in it. I don’t need to get paid. I just want to be on that team.”

Mike Caulfield, who posted the BlueHampshire entry, said his quotes are accurate and Shaheen did not say Clinton had made any promises.

“My impression is that he was not presenting it as a quid pro quo,” Caulfield said. “He never said anything about what Hillary said back to that.”

Shaheen helped run Jimmy Carter’s presidential campaign in 1976 and went to the Palestinian territories last year as an election monitor for the Carter Center. Shaheen, whose wife served three terms as governor, is considered one of New Hampshire’s political kingmakers and helped run the New Hampshire campaigns of Al Gore and John Kerry.

WASHINGTON (AP) – The chairman of the House Appropriations Committee is endorsing John Edwards in his presidential bid.

Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., said in a statement released by the campaign that Edwards is “the kind of man I want as my president.” Obey, who has served in Congress for nearly 40 years, cited Edwards’ initiative on health care, education and Social Security.

Edwards said in the statement that he was honored to have Obey’s support.

“Dave is a good friend and a true leader on the important issues facing our country – improving our schools, guaranteeing quality, affordable health care and protecting our natural resources,” said the former North Carolina senator.

Associated Press Writer Philip Elliott in Concord, N.H., contributed to this report.