Tag Archives: family values

H.B. 148 could be revived if conservatives are pursuaded….

The state represenative who introduced H.B. 148, LaVarr Christensen, is planning campaign to override the governor’s veto, according to a Salt Lake Tribune article in today’s news.

H.B. 148 was a bill designed to block same-sex couples’ ability to legally define their families through custody agreements.

Christensen, who is also running for U.S. Congress, introduced bills during the 2006 Utah Legislative Session, along with State Senator Chris Buttars, that were aimed at denying rights to gay and lesbian citizens of our state and were what I coined as “morality legislation”.

Stepparents and grandparents bombarded the governor’s office with phone calls and letters, afraid Christensen’s legislation could end up cutting them out of the lives of children they have raised. And Huntsman responded, rejecting the bill’s “undesirable consequences.”
Christensen insists the governor’s worries are unfounded. In an e-mail sent to his 103 colleagues last week, he urged lawmakers to remember his stated purpose. “This is a public policy decision regarding marriage, parenthood and family that is most appropriately decided by the legislature,” he wrote.

The Tribune article also mentions that Christensen did not return phone calls to the media inquiring about the issue.

This is clearly an attempt by a right-wing conservative to force one set of values on the whole of a population and waste taxpayers dollars by doing so instead of introducing legislation aimed at providing services for citizens.

What a waste.

Meanwhile….

While city councils are being subject to hearing resolutions from private think tanks on “natural” families, Salt Lake City’s new domestic partners benefit plan has attracted more than two dozen employees to enroll in the program.

Despite the efforts of some folks who are suing Mayor Rocky Anderson over the legality of this plan, the mayor’s administration is pushing the plan forward to offer these benefits.

Kudos to this administration for speaking out and standing up for “family” benefits for all who declare for themselves what their “natural” family is.

“Natural” Family?

Today’s Salt Lake Tribune has an article on a proposed resolution by the conservative Sutherland Institute urging mayors and councils to declare the “natural” family as the fundamental unit of society.

Here is what is in the resolution presented to by Paul T. Mero, President of the institute:

The document calls for cities to “envision a local culture” that:

  • “Upholds the marriage of a woman to a man, and a man to a woman, as ordained of God.”
  • “Celebrates the marital sexual union as the unique source of new human life.”
  • “See[s] our homes as open to a full quiver of children.”
  • “Envisions young women growing into wives, homemakers and mothers;
    and . . . young men growing into husbands, home builders and fathers.”
  • I would like to know who exactly defined what a “natural” family is. Hmmm….could it be the heterosexual men who wrote the christian bible, have been at the helm of all empires, and have served in dictatorships in nations and cultures since the beginning of human existence?

    This resolution clearly violates the rights of all people regardless of their view of a “natural” family. It is a slap in the face to women, gays, and people who practice religions other than Christianity. Additionally, in my opinion, it is a resolution designed by a right-wing organization to merge policy making with certain religious values.
    Continue reading