Tag Archives: anti-war

It’s “tax season” again. Each year an organization in which I participate shows the film “An Act of Consience” about a couple who in the 1990’s lost their home due to not paying the IRS the portion of their taxes that would go towards war. The film depicts their battle over losing their property and what they and their neighbors did to fight it, including squatting the house after it was taken by the feds.

We will be showing the film this Saturday at Free Speech Zone.

There will also be Tax Day Protests Across the U.S. Scheduled on Monday, April 17. I am the Utah contact for the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee (NWTRCC). It is my hope that through outreach efforts here in Utah we can get a resistance movement going against paying taxes for the war effort. One such action can also be adovcating publicly for the Department of Peace initiative. It’s amazing how much of our tax dollars goes towards that effort. See the budget analysis by the War Resisters League HERE.

The Art of War for the anti-war movement
By Scott Ritter
Posted on March 31, 2006, Printed on April 10, 2006

It’s high time to recognize that we as a nation are engaged in a life-or-death struggle of competing ideologies with those who promote war as an American value and virtue.

In the months leading up to the invasion of Iraq by a US-led coalition, and for three years since, I have spent many hours speaking to numerous anti-war forums across the country and around the world. I have always been struck by the sincerity of the vast majority of those who call themselves anti-war, and impressed by their willingness to give so much of themselves in the service of such a noble cause.

Whether participating in demonstrations, organizing a vigil, conducting town-hall meetings, or writing letters to their elected officials and the media, the participants in the anti-war movement have exhibited an energy and integrity that would make anyone proud. For myself, I have been vociferous in my defense of the actions of the majority of the anti-war movement, noting that the expression of their views is not only consistent with their rights afforded by the Constitution of the United States, but also that their engagement in the process of citizenship is a stellar example of the ideals and values set forth in that document, and as such representative of the highest form of patriotism in keeping with service to a document that begins, “We the People.”

Lately I have noticed a growing despondency among many of those who call themselves the anti-war movement. With the United States now entering its fourth year of illegal war in and illegitimate occupation of Iraq, and the pro-war movement moving inexorably towards yet another disastrous conflict with Iran, there is an increasing awareness that the cause of the anti-war movement, no matter how noble and worthy, is in fact a losing cause as currently executed. Despite all of the well-meaning and patriotic work of the millions of activists and citizens who comprise the anti-war movement, America still remains very much a nation not only engaged in waging and planning wars of aggression, but has also become a nation which increasingly identifies itself through its military and the wars it fights. This is a sad manifestation of the fact that the American people seem to be addicted to war and violence, rather than the ideals of human rights, individual liberty, and freedom and justice for all that should define our nation.

In short, the anti-war movement has come face to face with the reality that in the ongoing war of ideologies that is being waged in America today, their cause is not just losing, but is in fact on the verge of complete collapse. Many in the anti-war movement would take exception to such a characterization of the situation, given the fact that there seems to be a growing change in the mood among Americans against the ongoing war in Iraq. But one only has to scratch at the surface of this public discontent to realize how shallow and superficial it is. Americans aren’t against the war in Iraq because it is wrong; they are against it because we are losing.
Continue reading →