A Bill That Makes Sense? C’mon!

(cross-posted to Utah Legislature Watch)

Rep. Jen Seelig, D-Salt Lake City has a piece of legislation in store for this year’s session that will assist women on Medicaid with family planning.

Rep. Jen Seelig, D-Salt Lake City, says she will sponsor legislation in the upcoming session of the Utah Legislature to extend family planning services, including birth control, to two years following childbirth for women on Medicaid. The federal government would pay 90 percent of the cost. The bill may include a provision to extend the service to all families with annual incomes up to 185 percent of the federal poverty level.

The article points out that private insurance pays for similar services to women and that women on Medicaid should also benefit.  Further, since most unwanted pregnancies occur with teens due to Utah’s archaic law that prohibits teens from obtaining birth control, teen women should also benefit from such services.

The CDC cites statistics about pregnancy at its page,  Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)

babies born as a result of unplanned pregnancies are more likely to be unhealthy at birth, more often are below-normal birth weight and have to be cared for in costly intensive-care hospital units.

Rep. Seelig’s bill makes sense.  This population of women are in need of family planning services and should be able to receive them.

Wave of the future for petitioning: Electronic Signatures

(cross-posted to Utah Legislature Watch)

The L.A. Times is reporting today about the Utah group Peoples Right LLC and its current initiative on ethics reform which is getting signatures…. electronically.

Legal?  Maybe.  And possibly a precedent for the future.  For now, the state elections office will need to decide if the signatures will be accepted.

No state currently allows electronic signatures to be submitted for initiatives, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

But The Peoples Right LLC contends that Utah’s electronic signature verification law allows registered voters to submit their names online. The group is using its online system to gather signatures for two initiatives it is seeking to place on the Utah ballot in the fall.

But whether those signatures can be counted will be up to the lieutenant governor’s office, which administers elections in Utah.

State law acknowledges that electronic signatures are valid substitutes for handwritten ones, but the election code makes numerous references to paper forms that must meet strict guidelines before they can be accepted.

This will no doubt be controversial, especially in a state that has made citizen initiatives very difficult to organize.

Doctors Without Borders in Haiti

Doctors Without Borders have been frantically providing aid and medical help to victims of the most devastating earthquake in Haiti. To date they have provided aide to over 2,000 people and are needing to expand their surgical facilities due to the constant stream of victims pouring in and the non-stop surgical activities.

No brainer: Money belongs to The Navajo People

(cross-posted to Utah Legislature Watch)

This is a no-brainer folks.  The state of Utah needs to get its hands out of the affairs of the Navajo  people. It finally looks like steps are being made to allow them to manage their money from a 1933 trust fund that allegedly has been mismanaged by Utah.

The San Juan Record:

A long standing lawsuit has been settled which, if approved by the Utah State legislature and a host of other groups, will provide up to $33 million for the benefit of Navajos in San Juan County.

Why would the Utah State Legislature need to “approve” this?

The Pelt vs State of Utah lawsuit, alleging mismanagement of an oil royalty trust fund first created in 1937, has been brewing and simmering in the court system for decades. On January 4, federal judge William Canby helped broker a deal that resulted in the possible settlement of the matter.

The suit alleges that the mismanagement occurred over a long period of time before the State of Utah took over management of the trust fund in the 1990s. In more recent years, Utah abandoned its role as trustee. The new trustee has yet to be named and is the subject of legislation in the United States Congress.

First step:  Utah legislators need to “approve” and hand over the money that rightfully belongs to this nation.

Second step:  Let the people of this nation handle their own affairs, in this case managing their own money.

Sentaor Bob Bennett is sponsoring legislation in the US Senate that would turn over management of the trust fund from the state of Utah to the Utah Dineh Corporation, a group that includes representation from all of the Navajo Chapters in San Juan County.

It’s probably safe to bet that much more than $33 million was made (by white people) off of the Navajo Trust Fund than they are actually receiving back.

Paving Paradise

The Salt Lake City Council, sadly, unanimously voted in favor of beginning work on the multi-million dollar sports complex in Salt Lake City along the last undeveloped stretch of land on the Jordan River, despite testimony from scores of citizens against the location that will affect the riparian habitat in the parcel of land.

Here are the articles posted in papers today:

Deseret News
Salt Lake Tribune

I’m sure this isn’t over with regards to protecting the habitat.  I will be following this issue closely and posting about it’s progress.

Pave paradise, and put up a parking lot….

Joni Mitchell.  How appropriate for this crucial issue….and how true.  You don’t know what you got ’til it’s gone.

I live along the Jordan River myself and enjoy what it offers me – a place to walk or bike without the burden of traffic, beautiful scenery and habitat, serenity at times, and joy in watching families enjoy what I am enjoying as well.

Last week I posted a piece about Salt Lake City moving forward to build a huge Sports Complex along the Jordan River which will be detrimental to the riparian habitat in the targeted location.  The Salt Lake Tribune has now come out in opposition of the location targeted for the complex.

A packed City Council meeting last Tuesday held citizens from "both sides" of the issue.  Tonight there is another council meeting which folks should plan to attend to have their voices heard.

Upon reading the articles about this issue I have been saddened by the attacking comments to the articles by proponents of the location of the complex towards those who oppose it.  I do not think it is the complex itself that is the issue.  It is the location.  There needs to be another location found that will not hurt the habitat along the river.

Ray Wheeler of the Jordan River Restoration Project has asked that the contents of his message below be forwarded on.  He offers factual information and passioned sentiment.  I share his sentiments.   Please read, digest, and forward on to as many as possible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

JordanRiverFloodplainBeforeAfter_6.5inW_100pxPerIn copy.jpg

 

(Aerial photos:  Jordan River floodplain at 6200 South in 1937 and today)

 

Jan. 11, 2009

Friends of the Jordan River, open space and wild nature,

You will not often hear the editorial board of a major metropolitan newspaper say something like this:

——————————————————————————————————————-

“We have been unabashed supporters of locating Salt Lake City’s new soccer complex at 2200 North on the Jordan River. But we have been wrong.

Opponents of that location make a strong case that it should be reclaimed as a nature preserve, one of the last opportunities of its kind and size on public land on the Jordan.

So, despite all the work Mayor Ralph Becker’s administration has done in acquiring the Jordan River site from the state and completing preliminary design of the soccer complex, we believe the City Council should not approve the issuance of $15.3 million in general obligation bonds for the first phase of the project. Instead, it should press the administration to look elsewhere for a location.”  –Salt Lake Tribune, 1/8/09,  http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_14151787

 

What made the Tribune reverse its position?   Two things.

Continue reading

Saving open land in Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City is planning to move forward with plans to build a huge sports complex on open land that is home to the largest unprotected block of riparian habitat along the Jordan River….that is, unless the people take a stand to stop this madness.  Read the information below and plan to come to City Hall in Salt Lake City TONIGHT to protest this move.
———————————–
Friends,
It comes down to this:

Either we allow our elected officials to build with our own tax dollars a  $43 million sports complex consisting of nine buildings including indoor and outdoor soccer stadiums, 21 sports fields, a forest of stadium lighting, 3 new roads, a new bridge and parking for 1,700 cars on the largest remaining block of undeveloped, unprotected and publicly owned block of riparian open space along the entire length of the Jordan River—or we refuse, once and for all, to go along with this particular ridiculously over-the-top example of Business As Usual.

This 160 acres of land on the west bank of the Jordan River at 2200 North is incidentally within the flood plain both of the Jordan River and of the Great Salt Lake, has been flooded repeatedly during the past century, and will surely be flooded again.  Each time it floods we taxpayers will be asked by to rebuild it again and again.

That is perfect MADNESS my friends.

I have to believe that many of you are as sick and tired as I am of watching this sort of B.S. happen over and over and over again right before our very eyes without  anyone saying or doing anything to oppose  it.

The decision about where to build the proposed Sports Complex will set a definitive example for the future of the entire Jordan River Corridor.   A year-long study called “Blueprint Jordan River”, financed with $300,000 of taxpayer money, recommended in December 2008 that ALL existing open space within the river corridor be protected as natural open space—specifically including this particular site.

Now the Salt Lake City mayor and city council, after unanimously endorsing the “Blueprint” report, want to develop the everloving crap out of this site anyway.  If we let our elected officials walk away from their commitment to protect open space here, what kind of example does that set for the other 14 cities and two counties through which the Jordan River flows?  If Salt Lake City categorically refuses to protect its own largest block of public land in the river corridor, how can we expect the taxpayers to approve funding of up to $350 million to purchase and preserve some 3,800 acres of privately owned riparian open space with still more taxpayer dollars?

Reminder:  at 7:00 pm today, January 5, the Salt Lake City Council will review and vote on a critical appropriation to fund and green-light the siting of the Sports Complex at 2200 North.

Your attendance & comments are important, to ask that the vote be delayed & to allow public process on alternative sites for Sports Complex.

If possible, please come to pre-meeting Rally:
WEST STAIRS
of City-County Building
451 S. State St.
5:30 pm:  Q & A
6:00 pm:  Rally & informational presentation
Cards with talking points available, for those who want them.
Talking points also attached in this email.

We need people to get seating early, in the Council chambers – starting at 6:30 pm.

SL City Council meeting:
7:00 pm, Rm. 315
2-minute comments are encouraged but not required.
Fill out a card at Chamber entrance if you want to speak.

[If you can’t make it to the city council meeting, please consider signing our online petition and/or writing a letter—see petition link and email addresses and sample letter below.]

Please forward this widely.
See you there & thank you for all your help

Ray Wheeler

Director, Earth Restoration Network

Jordan River Restoration Project

Jordan River Restoration Network

Home phone:  801-355-6236

Work phone:  801-355-6236

Email:  ray.wheeler@earthlink.net

Salt Lake City officials want to build, entirely at taxpayer expense, a sprawling $43 million sports complex on a 140-acre block of open space along the west bank of the Jordan River at 2200 North (see illustrations and photos in the attached “background” document.)  The proposed facility, to be built in two phases, will eventually consist of 17 sports fields, a forest of stadium-type lighting poles, 3 new roads, a new bridge over the Jordan River, parking for 1,300 or more cars, and no less than 9 new buildings including an outdoor and indoor soccer stadium, a maintenance building, a concessions building etc.

SoccerComplexArialAndConceptPlan_432x341px_20091231 copy.jpg

 

20091024_SportsComplexSitePan2_100px6inW.jpg

 

Panoramic view of proposed Jordan River Nature Park site at 2200 North.  The structure at left is a model airplane facility which will be moved to another location.

Given the object lesson of Hurricane Katrina it is purest madness to build any large public facility within any flood plain.  This particular site is not merely within the flood plain of the Jordan River but also within that of the Great Salt Lake, which rises and falls cyclically, its saline waters moving long distances up the Jordan River from its mouth.  The site has been inundated by flood water twice within the past 60 years, and was under water for several years during the mid-1980’s.  It will flood again.  When it does taxpayers will be asked to bail out and rebuild the facility all over again.


This is the last, relatively large block of undeveloped, unprotected, publicly owned land remaining on the Jordan River.   Blocks of open “lowlands riparian” habitat this large serve as incubators and stepping stones for a large variety of native plants, animals and birds.  In recent surveys the public has overwhelmingly supported open land & habitat preservation instead of sports facilities at this location and throughout the Jordan River corridor 

Continue reading

“Free Market” Health Care

There is a lot of talk these days around health care in our country.  Utah is no exception.  David Clark, House Speaker R-Santa Clara, UT, has drafted a bill for  the upcoming Utah Legislative session.

An article in Monday’s Salt Lake Tribune describes the failed “Health Exchange” for insurers and Clark’s bill:

Insurers can sell plans through the exchange or on the open market. But because they calculate premiums differently “inside” and “outside” the exchange, disparities of up to 130 percent appeared.

Clark has drafted a bill that would merge the two small-group markets into one. Starting in July, insurers could only offer their small-group health benefit plans through the exchange. And they could no longer take into account employees’ pre-existing health conditions when calculating their premiums.

Instead, insurers would have to base a group’s rates on a modified community rating — factors such as employees’ ages and geographic location. Clark has added tobacco usage, body mass index (BMI) and management of blood pressure and diabetes to encourage better lifestyle choices.

The Exchange proved to be inefficient, with cumbersome application processes and purchased plans resulting in higher premiums which, passed on the employees and their familes, is not an option for improved health care insurance.

For sure Utah’s small businesses and individuals are still being hit hard and the “fixes” to date have not offered assurances for better health care insurance.

In coming years, the exchange will be open to individuals, but the initial focus has been on small businesses hit hard by rising premiums. The state’s plan is to eventually allow all Utahns to choose their own plan, and use contributions from employers and other groups to pay for it.

“We are migrating the market,” Clark said. “We’ve already made the decision legislatively and policy wise. We are moving from a defined benefit to a defined contribution market. We’re doing this incrementally, but the finish line is the entire insurance market migrates to that model.”

Take a look at the Utah Health Policy Project’s statistics published on its website about Utah’s uninsured (with “new data coming soon”).   The bottom line is that no matter what source you are examining, there are still too many people uninsured and unable to access health care.  Further, Utah’s children are being hit hard.  According to the published statistics,

Between 2001-06 the uninsured rate among Utah children grew by 63.3%. It grew even faster, by 90.4%, for low-income (<200% poverty level) Utah children.

UHPP also has a page of stories and testimonials from Utahns abuot health care.

Health care story – Eric Spencer from Lehi, Utah

When will the health care of people stop being talked about in the “market”?  Health care is a basic human right that has no place in the “market”.   Everyone should have access to health care and should not have to be faced with the decision of choosing between other essential issues such as food, rent, and job/career and education when considering how to obtain the care needed.

(Cross-posted to Utah Legislature Watch)

It just gets better: Incentives for businesses touted to be “good” for economy

The Silicon Business Journal has reported that Ebay will add 450 more jobs to its global operations on Utah. Good for Utah? It’s certainly good for Ebay.
Get this: Ebay will receive $30 million from Utah in tax incentives to add these 450 jobs. Make sense? Do the math:
450 jobs =If each new hire pays $10,000 a year in state income tax (a hypothetically optimistic scenario), that would generate $4.5 million. That’s quite a bit less than the tax incentives Ebay will reap from its expansion.
And more people will be laid off soon from how many state budget cuts? And this will help the economy how?

Legislators get brand new toys while citizens will feel impact of budget cuts

While budgets are being slashed, Utah legislators have and will reap the benefits of new technology: brand new laptops and cell phones.
The justification for this? According to an article in the Deseret News:

….legislative leaders point out that the new computers were authorized several years ago when the state was swimming in money.

Well there ya go. Now that makes sense.
Even though monies in excess of over $1 million are being cut from state budgets, monies that were already approved in prior budgets, legislator’s won’t feel the impact of that with their new toys. Here are the costs:

The new cell phone and service contract — which will cost around $145,000 a year — is already built into the Legislature’s ongoing budget. So the new phones aren’t costing the state additional tax dollars. And the Legislature is taking, on average, the same budget cuts as the rest of state government….Michael Christensen, head of the Legislative Office of Research and General Counsel, said the state will pay $12,031 a month for the phones and service.

Wow. Utah’s priorities really need more scrutiny. This expenditure is not responsible given what citizens are facing in terms of the impact of the looming budget cuts.

(cross-posted to Utah Legislature Watch)