Tag Archives: war

Nuclear Power

This is an interesting piece by Rowan Wolf of Uncommon Thought Journal
Who Gets Nuclear Power?

Who gets nuclear power and who does not? Who decides? The first is the million dollar question. The second seems to be the United States. However the decision making on who can and can not have nuclear power seems almost whimsical.

Now North Korea can’t have nuclear power because they have the stated goal of nuclear weapons. Of course Pakistan, India, and China have both nuclear power and nuclear weapons, but that is OK. In fact, the U.S. has a pact to assist India with its nuclear power.

Iran has civilian nuclear plants and wants to expand them, but it “can’t” because the U.S. (and perhaps others) are saying they will use the material to refine for nuclear weapons. This has meandered on to the point that the U.S. is citing a “deal with U.N. members to punish Iraq.” Actually, there are suggestions once again that the U.S. is preparing to attack Iran. Bush has “sent the message” that the U.S. won’t “live with” a nuclear Korea.”

But quietly the word slips out that Egypt is restarting its nuclear program after shutting down in the wake of Chernobyl. Somewhat surprisingly, the U.S. has offered to help with the effort.

If you are shaking your head, then I agree. What is going on here. On September 20th, the NY Times discusses the Egyptian decision as follows:

“Gamal Mubarak, the son of Egypt’s president, has proposed that his country pursue nuclear energy in a speech to the nation’s political elite, drawing strong applause while raising expectations that Mubarak is being positioned to replace his father as president.

The carefully crafted political speech Tuesday raised the prospect of two potentially embarrassing developments for the White House at a time when the region is awash in crisis: a nuclear program in Egypt, recipient of about $2 billion a year in military and development aid from the United States, and Mubarak succeeding his father, Hosni Mubarak, as president without substantial political challenge.

Simply raising the topic of Egypt’s nuclear ambitions at a time of heightened tensions over Iran’s nuclear activity was received as a calculated effort to raise the younger Mubarak’s profile and to build public support through a show of defiance toward Washington, political analysts and foreign affairs experts said.”

If this was a “defiant” move, then why did the Bush administration embrace it with an offer of assistance? What happened to the idea of a “democratic” Middle East? Egypt doesn’t quite count as a democratic government despite the move in 2005 to have more than one candidate for president (CIA, World Factbook). Perhaps it has something to do with Egypt’s resources (”petroleum, natural gas, iron ore, phosphates, manganese, limestone, gypsum, talc, asbestos, lead, zinc”) and geography (”controls Sinai Peninsula, only land bridge between Africa and remainder of Eastern Hemisphere; controls Suez Canal, a sea link between Indian Ocean and Mediterranean Sea”) (CIA, World Factbook). Or perhaps it is as simple as the Mubaraks (father and son) being seen as “Pro-western” (CRS, 2001) and of “assistance” in the U.S. “war on terrorism.”

+++
Interesting Tid-bits
According to Terrorism Project, Egypt has two active “terrorist” organizations. “Al-Jihad a.k.a Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Jihad Group, Islamic Jihad” which is suspected to have close links to al Qaeda and operations in “Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sudan, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom” and suspected funding from Iran. The other is “Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group, IG)” is assumed to be only aimed at the overthrow of the Egyptian government.

Egypt is not on the State Department’s list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. That list only includes Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria (Libya and South Yemen have been removed). There are also “havens” and “infestations” of terrorism listed by the Council on Foreign Relations. These include Pakistan, Somalia, Iraq, and the Palestinian Authority. Interestingly, Lebanon is not on any of these lists despite the presence of Hizbullah.

FAS Intelligence Resource Program: Terrorism: Background and Threat Assessments

National Strategy for Combating Terrorism

Version with active link to World Factbook will not publish, so here is the URL https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/eg.html

Imposing sancations against North Korea

I get it now. The U.S. has repeatedly said it does not intend to attack North Korea or topple its communist regime. But a visit from Conoleeza Rice to Asia, in the wake of an apparent 2nd North Korea Nuclear Test, is a
“putting pressure on South Korea and especially China to enforce economic sanctions. Those include what the United States describes as an aggressive inspection and interdiction program that stops short of a full blockade of North Korean trade.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has ruled out developing nuclear weapons, but a ruling party policy director raised that possibility soon after the North’s test.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday en route to Japan, Rice said North Korea’s recent underground nuclear test “does carry with it the potential for instability in the relationships that now exist in the region.”

“That’s why it’s extremely important to go out and to affirm, and affirm strongly, U.S. defense commitments to Japan and to South Korea,” Rice said.

I think she meant to say “imperial aggression”.

Nuclear Shockwaves

There have been waves of articles and commentary in today’s news since the announcement of North Korea’s test yesterday.

Welcome to the Nuclear Club
by Norman Solomon
Bush’s Nuclear Apocalypse by Chris Hedges
Analysis: North Korea Test a Sign of Weakness by Stephen Fidler
North Korea’s Nuclear Test and Bush’s FUBAR Foreign Policy by Heather Wokusch


(Photo/BBC)

And…….Experts Warn of an Accidental Atomic War

Nuclear missile modified for conventional attack on Iran could set off alarm in Russia

A Pentagon project to modify its deadliest nuclear missile for use as a conventional weapon against targets such as North Korea and Iran could unwittingly spark an atomic war, two weapons experts warned Thursday.
Russian military officers might misconstrue a submarine-launched conventional D5 intercontinental ballistic missile and conclude that Russia is under nuclear attack, said Ted Postol, a physicist and professor of science, technology and national security policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Pavel Podvig, a physicist and weapons specialist at Stanford.

“Any launch of a long-range nonnuclear armed sea or land ballistic missile will cause an automated alert of the Russian early warning system,” Postol told reporters.


A nuclear cloud. Sixty years after the first atomic bomb was tested in the New Mexico desert, the United States still has some 2,000 nuclear weapons on hair trigger alert and is considering new weapons such as earth-penetrating bunker
busters. (AFP/File)

Meanwhile, in North Korea…….

While the U.S. is spending funds to restore symbols of death and destruction (see my post below), perhaps advocates of nuclear war should be proud. North Korea is using nuclear weaponry in its most recent test blast.

North Korea said today it had performed its first nuclear weapons test, an underground explosion that defied international warnings but was hailed by the communist nation as a “great leap forward” for its people.
The reported test drew harsh rebuke from North Korea’s neighbors. The U.N. Security Council is expected to discuss the North Korean issue today, and the United States and Japan are likely to press for a resolution imposing additional sanctions on Pyongyang.
Condemnation of North Korea came swiftly after the test was announced.
“A North Korean nuclear test would constitute a provocative act in defiance of the will of the international community and of our call to refrain from actions that would aggravate tensions in Northeast Asia,” White House spokesman Tony Snow said.
“We expect the U.N. Security Council to take immediate actions to respond to this unprovoked act,” Snow said. “The United States is closely monitoring the situation and reaffirms its commitment to protect and defend our allies in the region.”
Snow declined to speculate on a possible U.S. response to a North Korean nuclear test. “At this point we’re still assessing the data and trying to figure out what happened,” he said. “A lot of this hinges on what the data tells us.”

Birth Place of Atomic Bomb “Preserved” and “Honored”

I was pretty shocked when I read a short article in today’s news about the Birthplace of the A-bomb being restored.

preservationists have gone behind the security fences to preserve for the first time a structure in which the Manhattan Project scientists did their work at Los Alamos National Laboratory. They contend the building is as significant as George Washington’s home or a Civil War battlefield.
This past weekend, a series of events marked the restoration of a wooden, garage-like building where the world’s first plutonium bombs were assembled.
Cynthia Kelly is president of Washington, D.C.-based Atomic Heritage Foundation, which is leading a drive to preserve key atomic-age sites at Los Alamos; Oak Ridge, Tenn.; and Hanford, Wash.
”It doesn’t look like much,” she said. ”It’s what happened there. It takes you back in time.”

It’s pretty sad when money is spent to idolize the history of death and destruction and in particular, the most devastating events of death and destruction (by the U.S.) in history.

What is wrong with this picture?

Anti-nuclear activist Greg Mello, who heads the Los Alamos Study Group, objects to the celebratory aura surrounding the events. He said the events should have a ”tone of grief and remorse” since they commemorate work that led to the bombing of the Japanese cities.
”The legacy is fear and . . . enormous national efforts devoted to weapons of mass destruction, and we’re still struggling with that today,” he said.

The simple structure is a reminder of the urgency with which scientists gathered in New Mexico in 1943 to design and assemble the first atomic weapons. There was no futuristic laboratory or sophisticated equipment on the mesa top where the federal government took over a boys’ ranch school.

The preservation project is quite costly, with most of the funds coming from our tax dollars.

The ”high bay” building, which Kelly said cost about $1 million to restore, is still behind security fences. Kelly said although the building is inaccessible to the public, she hopes that will change.
Funding for restoration of the ”high bay” building came from the federal government, $700,000 of it through the ”Save America’s Treasures” program. Several other sites at Los Alamos also are slated for preservation.

U.S. has ordered ships to Iran

Grave news: The Pentagon has ordered a major “strike group” of ships to head for the Persian Gulf, just off Iran’s western coast.
The fleet includes the nuclear aircraft carrier Eisenhower as well as a cruiser, destroyer, frigate, submarine escort and supply ship.

This is serious.

According to Lieut. Mike Kafka, a spokesman at the headquarters of the Second Fleet, based in Norfolk, Virginia, the Eisenhower Strike Group, bristling with Tomahawk cruise missiles, has received recent orders to depart the United States in a little over a week. Other official sources in the public affairs office of the Navy Department at the Pentagon confirm that this powerful armada is scheduled to arrive off the coast of Iran on or around October 21.
“This is very serious,” said Ray McGovern, a former CIA threat-assessment analyst who got early word of the Navy officers’ complaints about the sudden deployment orders. (McGovern, a twenty-seven-year veteran of the CIA, resigned in 2002 in protest over what he said were Bush Administration pressures to exaggerate the threat posed by Iraq. He and other intelligence agency critics have formed a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.) McGovern, who had first told a group of anti-Iraq War activists Sunday on the National Mall in Washington, DC, during an ongoing action called “Camp Democracy,” about his being alerted to the strike group deployment, warned, “We have about seven weeks to try and stop this next war from happening.”

David Swanson, coordinator for Camp Democracy, has written a piece in response to this news: Nuclear Winter, Global Warming, or Impeachment.

Camp Democracy Delivers War Crimes Indictment

Camp Democracy Delivers War Crimes Indictment.

At first, when they arrived at the White House Gate, they were told they would have to mail them. But they ultimately accepted the hand delivered document.

Former (R) congressional candidate seeks restraining oreder against Bush

Restraining Order against Bush Denied

A federal judge on Wednesday denied a former Republican congressional candidate’s request for a restraining order barring President Bush or Vice President Richard Cheney from bombing Iran or Syria.
Mary Maxwell, 59, of 179 Loudon Road, Apt. 10, Concord, filed a lawsuit Monday against Bush, Cheney and other “unnamed defendants actively engaging in acts of war against Iran and Syria in the guise of the war against terrorism.”

Maxwell’s suit seeks a ruling that the administration lacks legal authority to pre-emptively attack either Iran or Syria without a Congressional declaration of war, and that radioactive fallout from the use of nuclear weapons in any such attack would endanger people around the world, including herself.

Maxwell was one of two candidates who unsuccessfully challenged six-term Republican incumbent Congressman Charles Bass in the primary election last week.

One of Maxwell’s points, and one on which she feels she has standing, is that she (and everyone eles) would suffer the effects of nuclear fallout from dropped nuclear bombs. That’s in addition to the illegality of Congress handing over power to the Bush admiminisration to be able to declare war.

But because no personal harm has been demonstrated (yet), the courts will not bring her case forward.

It’s too bad that death and destruction have to happen FIRST before any action can be taken to stop these destructive illegal acts of aggression.

Middle School Magazine’s latest issue features pitch for the Army

This appeared in Common Dreams yesterday.  It speaks for itself.

Published on Monday, July 3, 2006 by the Boston Globe

Some See Army Pitch in Preteen Magazine
Editors of Cobblestone say that wasn’t intent
by Bryan Bender
 

WASHINGTON – What began as an attempt to educate middle-school students about the military has set off a string of complaints from parents and teachers that new learning materials designed by a New Hampshire publisher for 9- to 14-year-olds amount to little more than an early recruiting pitch for the Army.


(Photo/Cobblestone Magazine)

The latest issue of Cobblestone magazine, distributed nationwide to schools and libraries, is dedicated to the Army, a first for the popular periodical.

Titled “Duty, Honor, Country,” the issue depicts a soldier in Iraq manning a machine gun on its glossy cover and includes articles ranging from what it’s like to go through boot camp — “You’re in the Army Now” — to a rundown of the Army’s “awesome arsenal,” to a detailed description of Army career opportunities.

But most controversial has been the pair of teacher’s guides prepared in conjunction with the magazine, which is touted as meeting national middle school performance standards for English and language arts. The classroom guides suggest that teachers invite a soldier, Army recruiter, or veteran to speak to their class and poll students on whether “they think they might someday want to join the Army.”


“Some of the teachers were like `Holy cow, look at this,’ ” said Francis Lunney , a sixth-grade English teacher in Hudson who said he found a copy in his school mailbox in May and quickly lodged a complaint in a telephone call to Carus Publishing in Peterborough, N.H. “It looked exactly like the [official recruiting] material you get in high school. It didn’t seem to be that different the way it was packaged.”

The roughly dozen complaints come at a time when the military is struggling to meet recruiting goals and has undertaken more aggressive efforts to draw the interest of youngsters. For example, the Army has funded the development of video games to bring its message to teenagers across the country. But it has been criticized by some groups for its allegedly manipulative sales tactics, and has even faced attempts — unsuccessful so far — to bar recruiters from some high schools.

Cobblestone’s editors insist that the idea for the special issue was theirs alone, though they requested and received permission to use Army photos. They also received more extensive help from the chief historian of the Army Historical Foundation, Matthew Seelinger . The foundation, based in Arlington, Va., is a private, nonprofit organization and is independent of the military.

“We are not part of the government; we are not part of the Army,” said Seelinger. “They contacted us.”

Still, he said it was the first time the foundation had been asked to prepare learning materials for children. “I have never written for a children’s magazine before,” Seelinger said, adding that Cobblestone paid him about $500 for his contributions.

Cobblestone is one of a family of award-winning children’s magazines published by Carus. It was started by two teachers in 1979 to promote reading and history. It grew into six themed magazines that cover American history, geography, world cultures, world history, science and space, general studies, and reading.

The magazine “strives to educate and entertain through a creative mix of articles, primary source documents, photographs, and illustrations, as well as fun activities, puzzles, and cartoons,” according to its website. “Cobblestone Publishing works with consulting editors, writers, historians, professors, museum curators, teachers, and others who are noted authorities in their fields of study.”

Cobblestone has a national paid circulation of 30,000, but managing editor Lou Waryncia said its reach is far greater because one issue could be used by dozens of students — either in the classroom or in school libraries.

While previous issues of Cobblestone have dealt with the Civil War and other military conflicts, the recent issue is somewhat of a departure, said Waryncia, noting it is the first time that the Army was a focus by itself.

“We planned to do this well over two years ago,” Waryncia said. “It just happened to come out at a time when the country’s feelings are in a certain place” about the war in Iraq.

To some teachers and parents, the content appeared to be inappropriate for students who have yet to enter high school, where the military traditionally begins recruiting.

The issue includes an interview with Army Colonel Michael J. Davis , commander of the 52d Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group. He is asked questions such as “What made you decide to join the Army?”

The magazine discusses careers offered by the Army, including arts, media, computers, construction, engineering, intelligence, medical, aviation, legal, and transportation.

One of the teaching guides — written by Mary B. Lawson , a teacher in Saint Cloud, Fla. — goes much further, suggesting that a writing exercise be undertaken in which students “ pretend they are going to join the Army. Have them decide which career they feel they would qualify for and write a paper to persuade a recruiter why that should be the career.”

Some complaints have centered on the fact that little attention is paid to the combat role of the Army — its risks and sacrifices.

Waryncia said the magazine did not intend to recruit for the Army, but will reconsider future issues in light of the criticisms, which he said were greater than for any previous issue.

He said the magazine has not yet decided its lineup for 2008, but is considering issues dedicated to the Marines Corps, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard. He acknowledged that he would pay much closer attention to both the content and the teaching guides in light of the complaints.

Virginia Schumacher , a retired teacher and visitor services manager at the History Center in Ithaca, N.Y., who wrote another teaching guide, defended the issue.

“Joining the military is a career option for any child,” she said. “That doesn’t suggest they should or should not. Recruiters go into the high school all the time. Part of the curriculum in New York state is career options and how to make wise choices. In that magazine, I felt they gave a wonderful portrayal of jobs that are not what everyone thinks of when they think of the Army. It was not meant to meant to offend anyone.”

Copyright © 2006 Boston Globe