Tag Archives: politics

Green Party of Utah: Home of the Desert Greens

Recently I posted about the Green Party of Utah completing its ballot access drive and the numbers being certified by the state.

The next step in the process was to choose a new name for the ballot, due to another group having the same name as the Nationally Affiliated Group (with the Green Party of the United States). The unaffiliated group finished its drive first and the state recognized them with the affiliated group’s legal (incorporated and trademarked) name, stating that only the courts could resolve the name dispute for the ballot, remaining silent on state commerce law.

Putting the split issue aside (because of the need to move forward),and after a lot of deliberation with teh Elections Office, the new name for the political arm of the Green Party of Utah is “Desert Greens”.

By the end of March there will be a website linked from the Green Party of Utah‘s site to the political arm Desert Greens. The Desert Greens site of the Green Party of Utah will contain all the political, electoral, and candidacy information of Greens running for office for this party. The Desert Greens site will link back to the Green Party of Utah site.

By early next week canidates will be filed with the Desert Greens Green Party of Utah.

The Nationally Affiliated Green Party of Utah retains its legal name and will use it everywhere, in conjunction with its registered political party name, “Desert Greens”, except on the ballot. The name “Desert Greens” only will appear on the ballot.

HIll Happenings – Utah State and Federal

Articles published in today’s newspapers on Utah Legislative News – inlcudes news on U.S. Senators and U.S. House Represenatives from Utah:

Salt Lake Tribune
2006 Legislature: One for the history books
Bishop rejects Patriot Act amendments, while Cannon and Matheson vote yes
Hatch’s flag bill will move to floor: Proposed constitutional amendment: Utah senator’s measure would let Congress ‘protect’ American symbol
Matheson backs line-item veto

Brace Yourselves: Patriot Act is Renewed

I have posted some pieces here on the Patriot Act Extension Proposal and the debate over its renewal.

It’s official.

Yesterday the U.S. House narrowly voted to renew the Patriot Act in a “cliffhanger vote”.

The vote was 280-138, just two more than needed under special rules that required a two-thirds majority. The close vote caught senior Republican aides in both chambers by surprise.
Nonetheless, the vote marked a political victory for Bush and will allow congressional Republicans facing midterm elections this year to continue touting a tough-on-terror stance. Bush’s approval ratings have suffered in recent months after revelations that he had authorized secret, warrantless wiretapping of Americans.

Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, had this to say: “I rise in strong opposition to this legislation because it offers only a superficial reform that will have little if any impact on safeguarding our civil liberties.”

Provisions of the renewed act:
The package renews 16 expiring provisions of the original Patriot Act, including one that allows federal officials to obtain “tangible items” like business records, including those from libraries and bookstores, for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.
Other provisions would clarify that foreign intelligence or counterintelligence officers should share information obtained as part of a criminal investigation with counterparts in domestic law enforcement agencies.
Forced by Feingold’s filibuster, Congress and the White House have agreed to new curbs on the Patriot Act’s powers.
These restrictions would:
— Give recipients of court-approved subpoenas for information in terrorist investigations the right to challenge a requirement that they refrain from telling anyone.
— Eliminate a requirement that an individual provide the FBI with the name of a lawyer consulted about a National Security Letter, which is a demand for records issued by investigators.
— Clarify that most libraries are not subject to demands in those letters for information about suspected terrorists.
The legislation also takes aim at the distribution and use of methamphetamine by limiting the supply of a key ingredient found in everyday cold and allergy medicines.
Yet another provision is designed to strengthen port security by imposing strict punishments on crew members who impede or mislead law enforcement officers trying to board their ships.

Hill Happenings

Follow-up on Legislature 2006: Articles in published in today’s Utah newspapers:

Salt Lake Tribune
Senate killed bills on ethical standard–Resisting reform: Implication of impropriety angered some
Analyst says docs’ shield law won’t stand up in courtroom
Lawmakers ignored learning gap in 2006, education advocates say: Legislators ignored achievement

Deseret News
Land-use bill raises ethics questions

It’s Official: Campaign Season Has Begun

Today is the first day of a 10 day window that candidates can file for office in Utah. All 75 House Seats and 16 of the 29 Senator seats area up for grabs.

Today’s Deseret News has an article on what Senators seats are open.

The Green Party will be running candidates this year and will announce them after its 2006 nominating convention being held this week.

A special nominating convention was held in the fall for the U.S. Senate race (Orrin Hatch’s seat). Elected for candidacy was Julian Hatch.

These offices are up for election this year, along with their term of office and filing fee. For more information on requirements, visit the State Elections Office Website and for Salt Lake County offices, visit the Salt Lake County Elections Website.

Federal and State Offices

  • U.S. Senate (Hatch)
    6 years ,$1,160

  • U.S. House Districts 1, 2 and 3
    2 years, $387

  • State Senate Districts 2,3,4,5,7,9,11,12,15,17,18,21,22,24,26,28
    4 Year,$32.40

  • State House Districts 1-75
    2 Year, $16.20

  • State School Board Districts 2,3,5,6,9,10,14,15
    4 Year, $15.00

    County Offices

  • Salt Lake County Council At-Large C
    6 Year, $229.85

  • Salt Lake County Council (1,3,5)
    4 Year, $153.23

  • Salt Lake County Assessor
    4 Year, $574.92

  • Salt Lake County Auditor
    4 Year, $632.04

  • Salt Lake County Clerk
    4 Year, $580.20

  • Salt Lake County District Attorney
    4 Year, $712.32

  • Salt Lake County Recorder
    4 Year, $580.20

  • Salt Lake County Sheriff
    4 Year, $590.28

  • Salt Lake County Surveyor
    4 Year, $574.92

  • Salt Lake County Treasurer
    4 Year, $574.92

  • District School Boards-(Salt Lake City -Precincts 3,4,6;Murray-Precincts 2,3,4;
    Granite-Precincts 3,5,6,7;Jordan-Precincts 1,2,3,6)
    4 Year, $25.00

  • Judicial Retention Courts of Record
    4 Year, $50.00

  • County Justice Court Judges
    4 Year, $25.00

  • Townships
    4 Year, $10.00

  • Hill Happenings – Follow Up on Legislative Actions

    Articles in published in today’s Utah newspapers about Utah Legislature news:

    Deseret News
    Students picking up slack with tuition hike: U. levy to increase 10%, Dixie’s to rise up to 30%

    GDI endorsement of non-Greens

    Steve Kramer, a GPUS Steering Committe member and LJ blogger wtih Green Thoughts, provides a perspective on GDI endorsments of former Green Candidates.

    Hill Happenings

    Articles in published in today’s Utah newspapers about Utah Legislature news:

    Salt Lake Tribune
    Senate killed bills on ethical standards: Resisting reform: Implication of impropriety angered some
    Tax cut faded as chaos hit session–2006 legislative session: The last-minute breakdown showed crack in alliances

    Hill Happenings

    Articles in published in today’s Utah newspapers about Utah Legislature news:

    Salt Lake Tribune
    Lawmakers follow public will on majority of issues
    Bill to hit plaintiffs for cash irks EPA–Unconstitutional? Feds share the governor’s doubts about forcing suitors to pay for project delays they cause

    Deseret News
    The soccer boondoggle– Opinion
    Lawmakers are self-serving kings of the Hill– Opinion
    Waiting for Huntsman’s signature
    Board of Education seeking 2 vetoes: College-credit fees and charter school measure opposed
    Counseling, voting bills to benefit military: 6 measures to affect armed forces pass while 11 others fail
    EPA voices concern over environmental-bond bill: Huntsman delays signing, will review it for possible problems

    India=nukes o.k.; Iran=nukes not o.k.

    I’m confused. Bush visits India and negotiates a nuclear pact, including the manufacturing of energy and weapons.
    President Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of India announced here Thursday that they had reached agreement on putting into effect what Bush called a “historic” nuclear pact that would help India satisfy its enormous civilian energy needs while allowing it to continue to develop nuclear weapons.

    Bush and cronies denounce Iran nuclear arms.
    “It’s vital that the Iranians hear the world speak with one voice that they shouldn’t have a nuclear weapon,” Bush said at a news conference with German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. “We absolutely agree that Iran must say no to any kind of nuclear weapon,” Schroeder said.

    Iran says its nuclear program is meant to produce electricity, not weapons.

    Why is it o.k. for India and not Iran? The U.S. and Iran have signed the non-proliferation treaty while India has not. The U.S. has not upheld its part in that agreement.

    Not surprisingly, this is absurd. Again the U.S. is in effect telling the world “you will do as the U.S. says, not as the U.S. does because the U.S. is the most powerful nation in the world.”