Tag Archives: politics

Surprise: Utah ranks amongst lowest in reproductive and gay rights issues

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective have determined that Utah ranks 43rd out of 50 when it comes to 25 different laws from abortion bans to outlawing gay marriages, according to the groups’ “Mapping Our Rights” Web site which debuted Wednesday, May 31.

Utah earned slot 43 by its tally of “penalty” points assigned by the groups to laws they feel limit an individual’s right to choose who to marry, when to have children or access to certain types of health care. The higher number of points the worse the ranking.

Utah received points for state laws mandating counseling before abortion, a waiting period before an abortion and parental involvement in minors’ abortions as well as a lack of hate-crime laws for gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender people, a ban on gay marriages, and an abstinence-only education policy in school, among other items.

Of course opponents to gay rights and abortion were pleased with the ranking:

But Gayle Ruzicka, president of the Eagle Forum, an anti-abortion group in Utah, said of the state’s low ranking, “Good for us.”
“I am certainly disappointed that we didn’t make 50,” she said.

Jane Marquardt, the board chair of Equality Utah, says that she has seen positive changes in the past 25 years as more gay people have become more open and things such as domestic partner benefits have come to light in the political arena. She pointed out that the Utah legislature has two gay members and that the whole country will experience a shift in its openness towards gay issues.

Unfunded Mandates

Yesterday’s and today’s news is that Utah will receive a significant cut in Homeland Security Funds next year. Utah’s share of the $1.7 billion being distributed to states from the Federal Government for Homeland Security will be $8 million, down from $20 million in 2005.

According to the Salt Lake Tribune, Federal authorities are now shipping more dollars to states they say are more prone to terrorist attacks, such as those with large metropolitan areas or critical facilities. California received the most funds, at about $232 million, in the 2006 grants, with New York in second place at nearly $184 million. Utah ranked 45th of the 50 states and the District of Columbia for the amount of money received, with some less populated states, such as Idaho and Alaska, taking in more funds.

This is another example of federal government mandates for programs to each state (such as No Child Left Behind) and not providing adequate funding for implementation, while at the same time issuing consequences to states that do not carry-out federally mandated programs.

Hill Happenings – Special Session

Here are articles from local news sources on Utah’s Special Legislative Session:

Deseret News
Guv puts leaders in touchy position: Dental-care vote could hurt GOP legislators
Dental funding sidestepped: GOP lawmakers vote to keep issue in committee
Huntsman defends dental-care request: He had hoped for enough votes for dental proposal
Special session fought over ‘technical’ details
Pignanelli gets strong nod for tax commissioner
Trading fines irk brokerage houses: They’re ‘talking about not doing business in Utah’
Windfall for brainpower: U., USU using funds to recruit top researchers
Schools see funds shrink: Public education getting smaller piece of pie
Legislator vows to revive bill on drug overdoses: S.L. Demo to rework rendering-aid plan for 2007 session

Salt Lake Tribune
Guv: Dental aid checkup:
He revamps health bill for special session

Dental aid bill takes back seat to parking: Guv’s $2M pitch for needy fails; $15M Capitol garage gets nod
Talks with Mexico’s Fox were substantive, governor says
House strikes back at governor
Revenge? Angry at a PR loss, lawmakers demand a special session on taxes

<a href="

Hill Happenings

The Utah Special Legislative Session will begin Wednesday at 2pm.

According to today’s Salt Lake Tribune, these items will be up for proposal to be addressed following an address to the House and Senate by Mexican President Vicente Fox:

  • partial restoration of Medicaid dental benefits – a plan to spend $2 million to restore emergency dental service – tooth extractions and possibly fillings, exams and root canals – to about 40,000 elderly, blind and disabled adults.
  • consideration for allowing legislative and Governor’s Office staff to double-check revenue estimates from the state Tax Commission.
  • diverting $15 million from Capitol renovation funding to start building an underground parking garage on Capitol Hill.
  • Gov. Huntsman is asking lawmakers to approve raises for himself (increasing from $104,100 to $107,700)and state executives (The lieutenant governor’s would increase from $81,000 to $102,315).
  • relief bill for retailers who are struggling to implement a cut in the state grocery tax

    It is anticipated the much of the session will be spent debating the medicaid dental benefits.

  • “Click it or Ticket” – money well spent?

    I’d like to start this post by stating that I am not condoning not wearing seatbelts. I encourage people to wear seatbelts.

    I am against the government telling me that I have to wear a seatbelt.

    Yesterday the “Click it or Ticket” campaign was kicked off in Utah. Within four hours of the kickoff ceremony, 571 citations were issued to motorists not wearing seatbelts.

    I truly understand the need for motorists to wear seatbelts, however, they are hurting no one but themselves by not wearing them. Why, then, are our tax dollars being spent enforcing something that doesn’t affect the safety of others by virtue of someone not wearing their seatbelt? In my opinion, this is an invasion of privacy and yet another attempt by authorities to dictate what people do to their own bodies.

    I would like to know what me not wearing my seatbelt does to harm the driver in the lane next to me?

    The article (click link above) quotes Traffic officers say that unfortunately, the threat of losing money causes people to react more than the threat of losing their lives.
    “Maybe that will get people to catch on,” said Utah Highway Patrol Col. Scott Duncan.

    Advocates of this law say that the state has to pay so much money in emergency medical care for those involved in injuries resulting from not wearing seatbelts.

    So it’s not lives after all, it’s money. Bottom line.

    I would like to see the statistics and compare the cost of emergency medical care resulting from people not wearing seatbelts to the cost of all the patrol officers issuing citations yesterday and also to the costs of those wearing seatbelts and still being injured. I would also like to see statistics that compare time periods where mass citations are issued and other crimes are committed (murder, rape, theft, etc.) during the same time period where law enforcement resources would have been better expended.

    Again, I am not advocating not wearing seatbelts. Statistics show that people are more likely to die in accidents where people don’t wear seatbelts. I am against being told what I have to do to protect my own self. I want my tax dollars spent wisely, and, in my opinion, this is not the best use of my tax dollars.

    Utah’s Birth Rate a Plus?

    According to Utah Policy‘s Lavaar Web in his “Monday Buzz”. Lavaar’s piece, “Population Bomb is a Bust”, highlights parts of readings on population around the world, the decline of population in Europe and how Utah’s high birth rate will one day be an advantage:

    One day Utah’s high birth rate will be seen as a significant competitive advantage. We’ll have a workforce when others are lacking.

    While the U.S. increases the size of its population with force, the dollars spent on services to support its population is severely lacking, something that many European countries have an advantage over the U.S.

    See my post on the numbers of people who die each year as a result of not being able to afford healthcare.

    Utah’s Political Donors

    Big article in today’s Deseret News about Utah’s largest political donors – complete with charts and graphs.

    Liberal Leanings along the Wasatch Front

    The Salt Lake Tribune has a piece on liberal voting trends between 2000 – 2004 along Utah’s Wasatch Front. The article includes graphs and maps of statistical information on percentages of liberal and conservative voting records.

    There are some surprises resulting from the study. Not surprisingly, Salt Lake City has more liberal than conservative voters, but Murray, a suburb south of SLC has about an even amount of both. In fact, a significant portion of the area depicts 50-59% of voters leaning liberal.

    The map in this article is such that when you roll your mouse over each city you get information on the stats for that city.

    My city, West Jordan, is the 6th most conservative in the area, with a 60-69% conservative voting trend.

    Hill Happenings

    Governor Jon Huntsman, Jr. is expected to announce the call today for Utah Legislators to convene a special session beginning May 24. The special session will begin by greeting Mexican President Vicente Fox to Utah.

    At this point, it is predicted that Utah lawmakers will focus mainly on taxes:
    The governor wants tax reform, in the form of a “flatter, fairer” system of income tax that would provide long-term stability and predictability. But some lawmakers would be satisfied just to lower rates to get a $70 million tax cut before November’s election.

    Against Utah lawmakers wishes, the governor is considering putting the medicaid issue on the agenda. Advocates for the poor are urging the legislature to fund another year’s worth of dental and vision care for more than 60,000 adults on Medicaid – at a cost of $4.6 million.

    Newly released state Health Department data show between 2003 and 2005 – the last time dental coverage was pulled – the state and federal government spent $725,166 on hospital emergency room visits for Medicaid clients with oral health complications.

    I will be following this special session as best as I can and posting news items here.

    Senate Approves Border Fence – Utah’s Senators Sign On

    The U.S. Senatehas approved the building of a 370 mile border fence.

    Utah Republican Sens. Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett both voted in favor of the plan to build the fence. But they also voted in favor of an amendment that would have removed the provision giving illegal immigrants an eventual chance at citizenship. The amendment was defeated on a 66-33 Senate vote. In all, 41 Democrats joined with 24 Republicans and one independent to turn back the proposal.

    The amnesty proposal would grant illegal immigrants legal status as long as they have worked in the U.S. for five years, learn english and pay back fines and taxes.

    The Deseret Morning News published this table in today’s news: