Tag Archives: living wages

Utah’s $400 million surplus: Some Legislators want to reward the rich

Of course!  And wouldn’t ya know, it’s an election year next year – how conVENient!  Excerpts from the article,

Utah state government could have an extra $400 million next year, again fueling a tax-cut debate when lawmakers convene in mid-January.

“Tax cuts will absolutely be part of the debate” during budget-setting in the 2008 Legislature, which starts in three months, said House Majority Whip Gordon Snow, R-Roosevelt, following a meeting Tuesday afternoon of the Legislature’s Executive Appropriations Committee. The 2007 Legislature gave a $220 million tax cut.

According to the Legislature’s Fiscal Analyst Office, which projects state revenues in consultation with other state agencies, the state’s two main tax funds are running surpluses that could result in extra revenues of between $246 million and $406 million by the end of the current fiscal year — June 30, 2008.

Next year is an election year for Huntsman, all of the 75 House members and half of the 29-member Senate. Lawmakers and Huntsman have given hundreds of millions of dollars in tax cuts the past three years — including cutting the much-hated sales tax on unprepared food in half.

The state’s personal income tax has been reformed, lowering the new single tax rate to 5 percent from slightly less than 7 percent.

However, many Utahns are now complaining about their property taxes, which are going up across the state by an average 11.6 percent, the first double-digit increase since 1999.

The state does not levy a property tax. But through the Uniform School Fund, lawmakers require local school districts to levy a basic property tax to support public schools.

And a cut in their property taxes would certainly be welcomed among some taxpayers.

That may be so, but lowering property taxes hurts much needed services, like schools, roads, police and fire.  I wish people would take their heads out of the sand and look around them.  Everyone has their own needs.  But many Utahns have needs far greater than those of us who have roofs over our heads, money to buy food and utitilies and ways to get around – you know, basic services.

Surpluses should be used towards those needs not cutting taxes AGAIN which are used for services to address those needs.

More on salary increases

Also in today’s news is this item:

Utah County leaders’ salaries rising: Growth to help cover increases
By the end of 2007, Utah County commissioners will have received nearly $20,000 in salary increases in just three years.
      But they’re not alone. Other elected officials in Utah County benefited from a pay raise at the start of 2005 and will receive a collective 9 percent pay increase next year as part of the new $73.8 million budget county commissioners recently adopted for 2007.

Nine percent?  Why do these officials get such a significant increase when Utah can’t even decide on raising its minimum wage?

Photo
Deseret Morning News graphic

Commissioners determine raises for the county’s elected officials by following the advice of the Career Service Council. The council is a board of three people — none of them county commissioners — who compare like positions and salaries in the county to those across the country.

Sort of like the 12 person panel that spent $50,000 to determine if Utah should raise its minimum wage (not!)?

      According to White, the council found that a comparative composite salary for county commissioners elsewhere is about $103,000.
      County employees are generally given a cost-of-living salary increase of about 3-4 percent annually. However, elected officials are not, and they most likely won’t receive another raise next year.

I realize that each county decides how to spend its money but this is provided to point out as an example how fiscal decision making regarding income/salaries is not equitable.  Elected officials and other “leaders” seem to always get the big pay increases while the folks who work to pay their salaries have to work two and three jobs to put food on their tables. 

There’s something wrong with this picture.

Why is Raising Minimum Wage a Question?

The Utah Governor’s Office is going to release a “study” on raising minimum wage this Thursday. The “study” cost $50,000 and had 12 people on the “study” panel. The “study” resulted in no conclusive recommendations, therefore waiting until Congress raises the federal minimum wage (which hasn’t been done in eight years).

Why is it that it takes a panel and tens of thousands of dollars to decide to raise incomes to liveable (from poverty) standards? Other fiscal issues that do not impact human needs don’t experience the same process. Whenever legislators and other officials have a vote on raising their salaries, there is no panel or special funding involved to conduct a study.

Republicans, according to the article, “suspect” that most minimum wage earners are teens. But an organization that advocates for the homeless and low income has done studies that show less than 20% of minimum wage earners are teens. And so what if they are? Most teenagers I know have jobs because their families need them to help support themselves because of the low family income.

There should be absolutely no question that the ordinary working citizen’s income needs to be raised. End of story.