Kelp Katrina Victims and educate yourself at the same time!

I have been recently purchasing video documentaries from an organization called “Left Books”. Today Left Books came out with an offer to help victims of Hurrican Katrina. Here is their announcement – be sure to check out their website for all the fabulous books and videos they have on all sorts of progressive issues.

Help Katrina Survivors Fightfor Self-Determination and Aid

There is a battle going on between, on one side, the vultures of Wall Street – from real estate interests to Halliburton subsidiaries – who want to see a “New South” in the Gulf states that does not include its previous inhabitants. The U.S. government is complicit in this gentrification scheme with tax write offs to businesses and, thanks to Bush’s repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act, an incentive to create plantation-type workplaces where they can pay the lowest wage possible (A little bit of the “New” and “Old South”).

On the other side are the residents of New Orleans and other cities hit by the hurricane who are not going to let this happen without a huge fight – a fight they can win as long as progressive-minded people stand in solidarity with them. This is where you and leftbooks come into the picture: A grassroots organization founded by residents of the disaster-hit areas, Community Labor United (www.communitylaborunited.net) is fighting back and providing aid and relief to make up for the lack of it due to the failure of FEMA and the Red Cross. These residents are utilizing the People’s Hurricane Relief Fund to finance their efforts.

Today you can both arm yourself with the reading material to help fight injustice while standing in solidarity with the victims of Katrina at the same time. How? All of the proceeds from every purchase you make at leftbooks.com from September 28 to October 4 [now through Oct. 11th! – l.b.] will go directly to the People’s Hurricane Relief Fund. Leftbooks.com will present the sum total to a representative of Community Labor United on Oct. 6 [and again on October 13 – l.b.]. And, as if that’s not enough incentive:

Ivancic responds

A couple of days ago I posted an update on JOanne Ivincic, a Green running for Frederick City Aldmerman in Frederick, Maryland.

I wrote to Joanne to introduce myself. She has repsonded and we have a lot in common! She recently gave a talk to a group of young socialists at the high school in which I taught for 10 years.

Here is Joanne’s website:
Joanne for Alderman

Of particular interest is her article on water where she refers to having lived in Utah!

Green Party of Utah (and others) proposal on list serve protocol

The Green Party of Utah and other state green parties have put forth a Proposal on list serve protocol. There is some controversy over whether or not it is acceptable to keep the original language preventing users from using profanity on the list. Some folks thinks that kind of rule limits free speech. Others feel that having such a rule will create a safe place for participants to discuss issues. I have created a poll to see what folks think:

Tuesday’s elections

All elections in Utah this cycle are municipal and non-partisan. There are no Utah Greens running for office this year.

I live in West Jordan, UT which is a very “red” community of about 100,000 people, about 12 miles south of Salt Lake City. Tom has run for state house here as a Green twice. The last time he garnered about 10% of the vote. So maybe voters are starting to “wake up”.

Tuesday’s mayoral election will be interesting in West Jordan. The Republican incumbent is being challenged by four other candidates: Jeff Haaga, Richard Jackman, David Newton, and Brian Pitts.

In my opinion, incumbent Holladay is pro-business of the large corporation type. Just in my neighborhood, tiny businesses have gone out of business (or are in the process of such) and strip malls have been emptied due to the impact of the larger mega-malls that have been built about a couple of miles west of here. The area in which I live is an older one, although a new development was built across the street from our 100 year old home and all the older homes on the corner south of us were bought out last year and leveled. The land now sits as an empty field, up for sale.

I’m not sure who I will vote for yet, but it won’t be Holladay. One deciding factor, among others, will be mass transit issues. The bus I used to take regularly had its route completely cut. It is now somewhat of an inconvenience to take mass transit from where I live. Busses also do not run on Sundays outside of Salt Lake City. My neighborhood has quite a few low income, elderly and hispanic residents, many whom depend on mass transit for transportation.

Here are positions by three of the other mayoral candidates, according to the Salt Lake Tribune (linked article above):


Jeff Haaga, 49, says the city isn’t making sound financial decisions. He points to city debt, property-tax rates and impact fees as places of concern.

Richard Jackman, a 35-year-old Utah Transit Authority bus driver, also worries about city finances. He argues that city leaders have boosted the budget by crafting ordinances that ding residents in the pocket book.

“The issues of transportation are making more people frustrated, especially for people moving
east and west,” said Brian Pitts, 49, another mayoral candidate. Pitts, who owns a satellite television business, says West Jordan needs better, wider roads and improved mass transit. Pitts said, as a two-term city councilman from 1994-2002, he helped to pressure the Utah Department of Transportation to widen Redwood Road.

If progressives can win in Utah, they can win anywhere -London Guardian Article

Last week I posted an article about Gary Younge, a London Guardian correspondent, interviewing several of us on being liberal in a red state at the weekly peace vigil in Salt Lake City.

Younge’s article appears today in the Guardian.

The article has a heavy focus on Rocky Anderson, SLC’s liberal and outspoken mayor. One paragraph outlines Rocky’s recent efforts:

Anderson, who was re-elected for his second term in 2003, supports gay marriage, opposes the war in Iraq and is a strong environmentalist. He is converting his city’s fleet to alternative-fuel vehicles in order to honour his commitment to meet Kyoto’s standards on greenhouse emissions by 2012. Two weeks ago he extended benefits to non-married domestic partners of city employees, effectively giving health insurance coverage to gay and cohabiting couples on his payroll. In August, when Bush came to town to bolster support for the Iraq war, Anderson emailed activists calling for “the biggest demonstration this state has ever seen”. Two thousand people showed up, making national headlines.

Younge also delves into the “demography” of blue vs. red in U.S. regions and blue within red states. He also points out the myth that liberals only inhabit coastal areas, Salt Lake being a prime example. Interviews with several people point out that progressives here are dedicated and have their work cut out for them.

Younge has one paragraph on our sidewalk vigil:

Standing opposite the main federal building Tom King holds a sign saying: “Make levees not war”, along with four others on their weekly Thursday antiwar vigil. “At the beginning people threw open bottles of soda, half-eaten hamburgers and raw eggs at us,” he says. But in the 15 minutes I stood with him only one man shouted: “Get a clue, you bunch of morons”, while far more people beeped their horns in support and waved. Last week thousands turned out for an anti-war rally in town.

More September 24 Rally pics

From “Joanne” who gave us a CD full of photos.
Here are a few, but to see all 41, go to:
Rally Pics

More on Joanne Ivancic, Frederick, Maryland

Last week I posted an article on the Green Party in Frederick, Maryland and my connection to that area of the U.S.

Today when I talked to my daughter, who lives in Frederick, she enthusiastically told me of the Green Party Table being at the annualIn the Streets Street Festival (too bad this article only mentions the other two parties being at this festival….). I was very proud of her when she could tell me the name of the woman running for city alderwoman in this fall’s race there.

I found some recent articles that mention Joanne Ivancic, pasted below. The third article is about a biodefense project at Fort Detrick. (I used to live just outside the back of that place, in my first home that I owned as an adult in Frederick. It was kind of creepy, with all the reports of water contamination, etc.).

Candidates let public know stance at forum

Joanne Ivancic, the Green Party candidate for alderman, supported the idea of keeping homeless shelters open year-round instead of only during the colder months of the year.

“People need a place to stay, regardless of how cold or hot it is,” she said.

Coverage appreciated
JERRY KESSLER Frederick
Thanks to The Frederick News-Post for its excellent coverage of Green Party alderman candidate Joanne Evancic and the Green Party progressive program to bring Frederick to the front in the 21st century.

Planned biodefense complex at Fort Detrik a real cause for concern, by Joanne Ivancic.

The Tentacle – a Frederick News and Commentary site.

Debate focuses on city’s ‘have-nots’

Liberty Tree Foundation

Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution

The non-profit Liberty Tree Foundation has recently been formed to support new democracy movements. Here is the mission statement on its website:

The Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution is a non-profit organization rooted in the belief that the American Revolution is a living tradition whose greatest promise is democracy. Our central purpose is to build on the accomplishments of earlier American movements by launching a new stage in the struggle for democracy.

There are projects and links to other organizations on this site.

Among its founders are David Cobb and Ben Manski, both Greens.

Florida Delegate Denounces GPUT Delegate

My previous post contained the statement that the GPUT made in regards to the impeachment of five GPUS SC members. As a result of that issued statement, a Florida delegate made this statement:

Sun Oct 2 11:10:57 EDT 2005

Tom

At this point, you do not speak for the Green Party of Utah. You need to
pick another name. The Green Party of Utah is not represented on this SC.
Your use of this name, I believe is fraudulent. We all have seen the letter
posted from the Utah election division stating, in no uncertain terms that,
although there is a Green Party of Utah, you have nothing to do with it.

((name snipped))
FL

I usuall stay fairly quiet on the discussion lists, as an alternate delegate, but I had to respond to this one. Here is my response:

((name snipped))is incorrect in her statements of the Green Party of Utah. The statement in her post “The Green Party of Utah is not represented on this SC.” is inaccurate. States are represented to the NC, not the SC. Beyond that, the Green Party of Utah **is** represented on the NC by virtue of its historical and ongoing affiliation with the GPUS. If anyone is in disagreement with this status quo, then I urge them to follow the established procedure to challenge the accreditation of the Green Party of Utah.

The letter that was sent by Jeff Beardall to individuals on this list from the Director of Elections also does not include the letter written to the Director of Elections by the affiliated GPUT’s filing officer with paragraphs in it from the state code which the Elections Office is violating. (copies of this letter can be sent to anyone desiring it upon request).

While the Director of Elections has, in personal conversation and in writing, informed the affiliated Green Party of Utah of its silence on national party recognition, incorporations and trademarks, he is also in violation of Utah Commerce Law. Please refer to the affiliated Green Party of Utah certificates of incorporation and trademark at:(links created as titles in this entry for ease of use.)
incorporation and trademark and Utah Dept of Commerce (enter “Green Party of Utah” in the Utah Dept of Commerce Business Entity Search Field).

According to the State Election Director’s stance, in Utah **anyone** can conduct a petition drive under **any** name and obtain ballot access if the name does not conflict with another “registered” party’s name. Thus, anyone who wants to attempt to hijack a political party can attempt to do so with ease under the current Director of Election’s interpretation of the Utah state election code.

It is not the “State of Utah” that recognizes the unaffiliated group. It is **one** division of the state of Utah, which is clearly in violation of all other laws under state code.

If this newly organized “Green Party of Utah” wishes to participate in the GPUS, there are established procedures for them to follow to seek affiliation. At this point in time this group does not have affiliation with the GPUS and continued reference to them as though they do is out inaccurate and inappropriate.

Deanna Taylor, Co-Coordinator, Alternate Delegate
Green Party of Utah

The Florida Delegate’s response:

Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:33 PM
Subject: [usgp-coo] Utah on NC

I made a mistake. I of course, meant to type NC. Glad you trademarks are so on the ball.

((name snipped))FL

NOTE: Remember, the incorporation and trademark was done as a result of Jeff Beardall, never before a registered green or member of the GPUT, attempting to do the same to hijack the party (proof of this can be provided upon request). Insights of our members led the party to pursue incorporating and trademarking to prevent Beardall from taking over the party and its assets.

I would also like to add that it is highly inappropriate for delegates to the GPUS from other states to tell another state’s delegation what to do, i.e., “you must choose another name.” In fact, the Director of Elections has informed the Green Pary of Utah that we may continue our petition drive (almost completed, fyi) under the name Green Party of Utah, per the procedure of the election code, and when our drive is declared by **us** (as the Director of Elections has instructed) as complete, only then will the name issue be addressed.

The thread continued a little throughout the day, with most folks who wrote defending the GPUT and requesting that the Florida delegate apologize. But then came another set of remarks from the Florida delegate:

Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:18:16 -0500

I did not attack the green party of Utah, I attacked someone purporting to represent the Green Party of Utah. I was defending the Green Party of Utah against someone misrepresenting it. That this body has, so far, chosen to recognize 2 people who represent zero Utah Greens is very unfortunate.

So, as for the apology, I wouldn9t hold my breath if I were you.

((name snipped))
FL

NOTE: It is important to remember, as another delegate pointed out that the fact that a ‘Green Party’ is recognized by a state doesn’t mean the Green Party of the United
States must also recognize it.

In Virginia, there’s a state-recognized party called the Independent Greens, started by a guy
who was expelled from both the DC and Virginia GPs. It is not recognized by the national GP.

No Impeachment

The GPUT issued this statement to the national discussion list tonight, in regards to the current impeachment of five GPUS Steering Committee Members:

The Green Party of Utah (the GPUT) formally opposes the impeachment of any GPUS Steering Committee (SC) Members at this time, via consensus of the State Coordinating Council. The GPUT therefore opposes the current impeachment of the five GPUS SC members and suggests withdrawl of the impeachment proceedings.

Tom King, Delegate
Green Party of Utah