This came across my desk today from Kathy Dopp of Utah Counts Votes:
Background: Elizabeth Liddle’s work was widely quoted by U.S. press to support dismissing the evidence of outcome-altering vote miscount in the US 2004 presidential election.
Coincidence that these two were posted on the same day?
“How to read exit polls: a primer” by Elizabeth Liddle
Sat Nov 04, 2006 at 11:48:26 AM PST
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/4/135126/905
and
“Tight Lid Kept on Exit Poll Vault” by Ian Bishop
New York Daily Post
http://www.nypost.com/seven/11042006/news/national…
Is there ANY doubt who Elizabeth Liddle is employed by?
Is anyone else curious why Liddle has revived, in her Daily Kos article, a previously disproven hypothesis that Liddle formerly disavowed vehemently, in numerous harranging emails to myself and my academic colleagues?
See this list of mathematical proofs that what Liddle says in her Daily Kos article is incorrect:
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Incorrec…
See my response to Liddle’s Daily Kos post here:
If Americans don’t think that our upcoming Tuesday election is going to be targeted for vote fraud, then we must be hopelessly naive, given that our current U.S. election system is not independently audited; hides the evidence of vote miscount in aggregated election results data, and uses vote casting and counting equipment that is ideal for undetectable tampering!
What do U.S. experts say?
Deanna Dee-Dee Taylor 